User talk:Jdsanch1

The Regular Form

Hi. I've redirected The Regular Form because it is simply an extension of a pre-existing article. This is known as a "content fork" and is generally discouraged. You should consider developing the main article instead. andy (talk) 23:01, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regular form section that you added to SMC article

I removed the section you added to Sliding mode control. In particular, I moved it to Talk:Sliding mode control where it can be reviewed and fixed. There are several \cites and \refs within it that make it appear to be a section of a LaTeX manuscript. Wikipedia should not be used to publish your own work nor over-emphasize points important to you but perhaps not important in a general treatment of a subject. At a minimum, these \refs and \cites need to be replaced with their analogous Wikipedia structures. Of course, the targets of each \cite need to be added to the page's references. Additionally, typos (like using the word "for" when "form" was intended) need to be fixed. It also is not advisable to capitalize Regular Form. —TedPavlic (talk/contrib/@) 16:36, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]