User talk:Jdidda

About your sandbox

Hello! First and foremost, thank you for disclosing that you are a paid editor in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use. However, the tag you added to the top of your sandbox is for undisclosed paid editing, which can send the wrong message.

Instead, you should use Template:Paid contributions at the top of your sandbox, and use Template:Paid on your userpage. Additionally, you should familiarize yourself with how to edit with a conflict of interest. I'll be placing a proper welcome message on your page shortly. I hope this helps! Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 08:04, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Jdidda, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 08:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nyasia L. Harris (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Annh07 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nyasia L. Harris and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Annh07 (talk) 08:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I made some changes and added some noteworthy additions to her biography, I was afraid to put them in before because I didn't want it to read like a press release. Currently i can't resubmit because I have "exceeded" a limit. I am not sure what that means I will resubmit in a day or two. Jdidda (talk) 22:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to resubmit I hope its enough to be accepted. Jdidda (talk) 22:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jdidda! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Annh07 (talk) 08:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Wizgirl1470 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wizgirl1470. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 03:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nyasia L. Harris (March 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Not to mention socking.

S0091 (talk) 18:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know how to appeal the sockpuppet allegation. Jdidda (talk) 16:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow the guidance contained in the "appealing blocks" section of the block notice. Amortias (T)(C) 16:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nyasia L. Harris

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nyasia L. Harris, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Yann (talk) 07:40, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be deleted. I was trying to create this page based on the proper criteria. however I have been blocked an accused of suckpuppetry when that was not my intention and I am not sure how this appeal process works. Jdidda (talk) 14:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to appeal your block, post the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Copy it, paste it at the bottom of the page and add a reason. win8x (talking | spying) 14:18, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jdidda (talk) 00:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jdidda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A while back I was accused of sock puppetry I am not an experienced Wiki user. I assumed I was following the guidelines to update information in the manner as described. I identified myself as a paid person who was updating or attempting to create my clients pages. The reason for the sockpuppet allegation was because of a misunderstanding that I tried to explain but I was told by the moderator that they did not believe me. I do appreciate and understanding why the need for increased scrutiny in order to keep the community free from bad behavior and misleading information. I truly would like a way to regain my status so I can learn how to use this platform properly. Before the incident I had made minor updates and edits to various pages without any incident. I apologize again.

Decline reason:

I can not find where you disclosed yourself as a paid editor and you did not reveal where you claim you did so. You also say you tried to clear up the misunderstanding around your sockpuppetry, but don't indicate where. Therefore, there are no grounds to consider lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 10:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jdidda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here the page where I indicated i was promotion was deleted. The Nyasia L. Harris Page. I would love to talk with the person about sockpuppetry

Decline reason:

You need to review and comply with WP:PAID, which includes disclosure instructions. Placing {{Undisclosed paid}} on the page is not proper compliance. You need to specify what steps you will take going forward to comply with the policy. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.