User talk:Jcpag2012

Archives

2013
2014

Earth

Why did you remove the lead image I added without at least saying why? There is an open discussion on the talk page about it. Tetra quark ^(talk) 14:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm....A2soup remove the lead image. Thanks! --Jc pag 2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikipedia 06:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Squidward's School for Grown-Ups.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Squidward's School for Grown-Ups.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:47, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Millennium Remake 1.21

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Millennium Remake 1.21 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.demonews.com/download.php?det=3117#.VO2Bm-H3YUo. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BethNaught (talk) 08:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ummmmm...... --Jc pag 2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikipedia 06:22, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hey! You change and add a lot of images, which is great, but I think that other editors (including myself) are sometimes confused about the rationale behind your changes. Since we don't know why you change the images, we are more likely to revert your changes. Would it be possible to leave edit summaries briefly explaining why you are changing or adding images in the future? Thanks :) A2soup (talk) 05:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not touch these articles of the Solar System because it's okay. Right. :) --Jc pag 2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikipedia 06:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't mean don't touch them. I mean touch them, but just say why you did :) A2soup (talk) 09:39, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense images

Stop adding such nonsense images as you did to 2004 XR190 and 2060 Chiron. They serve absolutely no purpose. --JorisvS (talk) 11:09, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please quit inserting images from Celestia that just use a meaningless generic texture to create an image. They add no value to the article and could mislead people into thinking we know more about these objects than we do. -- Kheider (talk) 13:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Astronomy Picture of the Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Natural color

Note that this image is not in natural color, just like the other one (I do agree with your edit, though). They do look more natural than this one, even though all three have been made using the same extreme ultraviolet wavelength (30.4 nm). --JorisvS (talk) 11:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. :) --Jc pag 2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikipedia 02:41, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BenLinus1214 was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jcpag2012/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BenLinus 1214^talk 02:44, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Planets (video)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Planets (video), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0168125/plotsummary.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crap images

You've been asked (by multiple editors) to stop putting those nonsense images into those articles, yet you simply continue. Why? --JorisvS (talk) 13:07, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously it's a meaningless artist's impressions, just okay for that. Thanks :) --Jc pag 2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikipedia 00:13, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pluto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright images need to be low res

We can only use copyright materials under certain conditions, and one of them is that we use low res versions. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:55, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

per your comment on my talk page, we already have a low res version of the image. we cannot use high res versions of copyright materials. please read WP:FAIR and WP:COPYRIGHT. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 10:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Uranus from Keck Telescope in 2004.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Uranus from Keck Telescope in 2004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:24, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Whale of a Birthday, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom King. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) --Jc pag 2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikipedia 02:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planetary Mass Objects in the Solar System (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of gravitationally rounded objects of the Solar System instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Planetary Mass Objects in the Solar System and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 13:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image source

Hi John - regarding File:Neptune_orbiter.jpg, can I ask what the actual source is? I see you gave credit to NASA, but the source you gave is an image file from DavidDarling.info. In the image's upload history, you specified that the image came from a PDF. Can you update the source to the PDF, which should also show that the image is from NASA? Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 15:55, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template messages

I've noticed you've been welcoming well-established users and placing irrelevant template warnings on the talk page of an editor who has been blocked for months. If you're experimenting, you need to do so in a sandbox. Otherwise, I'd cut back on the template/welcome messages until you know what's up with them. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 07:19, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SuperHamster: I will not do that again, thanks. :) --Jc pag 2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikipedia 07:26, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sun 2

File:The Sun in extreme ultraviolet.jpg

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:The Sun in extreme ultraviolet.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:17, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eris Explorer

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eris Explorer, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.ioss.ca/ErisExplorer.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eris Explorer deleted, final warning for copyright violations

The above article was deleted as an obvious copyright violation. Eris Explorer is not a real mission but a simulation ([1]), as is everything else on that website.

Also, that's your third copyright violation this year. One more and you will be blocked indefinitely per Wikipedia:Copyright violations#Addressing contributors. MER-C 13:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, do not do that again, thanks. :) --J C P (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 00:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images

You uploaded a high-resolution version of File:IC 1101, telescope image.jpg. Non-free images must be of a minimal size, typically no more than 400px. You were blocked on Commons for image violations, and have received multiple warnings here for the same. I would strongly suggest that you no longer involve yourself with images on Wikipedia. If you continue to cause disruptions, you may very well find yourself blocked here as well. I'm happy to discuss these issues with you if you are willing, but stop messing around with images, since it is clear that you do not understand policies and procedures, both here and on Commons. — Huntster (t @ c) 11:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SpaceBob InvaderPants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SpaceBob InvaderPants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpaceBob InvaderPants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Mediran [talk] 01:59, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WP:FPC. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Consider this your second warning. Familiarize yourself with the criteria, and avoid striking other editors' comments. An unwillingness to do both is quite disruptive. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:53, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at WP:FPC. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Again, you have added second and third votes to pages. This is disruptive. Take a break, learn the process, or face sanctions. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruptive editing. You have been warned repeatedly to behave in an appropriate manner, but you seem to not be capable of doing so. In particular, you act as if your edits to images cannot be touched by others, and you have been repeatedly warned that your photoshopping of certain images is inappropriate as well. I've come to the conclusion that WP:COMPETENCE and possibly language barriers are major issues here. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jcpag2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Huntster, please, follow the rules , do not do that again, I promise. Thank you. :) --J C P (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 04:48, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Max Semenik (talk) 05:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jcpag2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Block indefinite is too long. Huntster, please, follow the rules , do not do that again, I promise. Thank you and unblock me. :) --J C P (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 07:12, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply to email sent today

I am an administrator, and I am declining your emailed unblock request because you did not address the reasons why you are blocked. Merely stating "I need help to edit" is not going to hold muster. MER-C 13:25, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emails

You can repeatedly email me that you 'need help editing', but you've been blocked because you have serious competency issues: you were mostly just creating a lot of work for other editors. I happen to fully agree with the block. --JorisvS (talk) 20:22, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abusing the email function

If you continue to email other users asking to be unblocked, I will remove your ability to use that feature. Any requests for unblocking should be done on this talk page. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:52, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have continued to abuse the email function, I've removed your ability to use it. — Huntster (t @ c) 03:51, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already I read it, thanks. :-) --J C P (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 09:35, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of your unblock request

I have reverted your unblock request. You were advised to read WP:GAB to understand what you need to do in requesting an unblock. Instead you pasted it into an unblock request and basically instructed a reviewing admin to read the guideline, then unblock you. This shows you have serious competency issues. It is highly likely your next unblock request will be your last as a reviewing admin may revoke your access to your talk page. Blackmane (talk) 03:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I already read WP:GAB. Thanks. :-) --J C P (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 22:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jcpag2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To make people trust you again. Don't do it again.

Decline reason:

Again, this makes no sense. As you've had several attempts at trying to put together something coherent, and it does not seem to be improving, I have removed your ability to edit this page. Kuru (talk) 01:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your unblock request

{{unblock|1=Hi Jcpag2012, give me another chances, please, promise.}}

Note: User:SevaresMark has been blocked as sock of Jcpag2012. Blatant block evasion. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Solar_Spectrum_by_NOAO.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Solar_Spectrum_by_NOAO.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 189.25.240.76 (talk) 05:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC) 189.25.240.76 (talk) 05:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Request on Commons.

A file you nominated as a Featured Picture on enwiki is being discussed for deletion on Commons, as a copyright violation. Please see c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Solar and Heliospheric Observatory images. Thanks. Revent^talk 02:36, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jcpag2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Huntster, please unblock Jcpag2012, but no more editing, promise, be good, don't do it again.

Decline reason:

This request is posted by a different account; either this is a block-evading sock or a well-wishing user who does not understand policy. Either case must result in a refusal. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, User:Jcpag2012/sandbox

Hello, Jcpag2012. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:11, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SpongeBob You're Fired - Title Card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SpongeBob You're Fired - Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aglaja (asteroid).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aglaja (asteroid).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Screenshot010 millennium remake.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot010 millennium remake.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of television channels in Guam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of television channels in Guam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.docomopacific.com/tv/channel-listing. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 06:30, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hello Bikini Bottom!

Hello, Jcpag2012. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hello Bikini Bottom!".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Titlecard Help Wanted.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Titlecard Help Wanted.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Toutatis from Chang'e 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toutatis from Chang'e 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Hayabausa Image of the asteroid Itokawa.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hayabausa Image of the asteroid Itokawa.jpg, which you've attributed to https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap051228.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. House Blaster^talk 00:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]