User talk:Jcolls4
A pie for you!
[edit]
|
Message! 2spooky (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC) |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Jcolls4, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello! and Peer review
[edit]Hi Jcolls4, we're in a peer review group together along with rember glia and thepoloarbear. How do you want to set up the rotation? I can review yours and remember, for starters. Also, I'm behind on editing my article. I can have that done by tonight, but right now it's the same as my reference. Thanks GreenMacaw (talk) 17:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Test
[edit]This is just me verifying how to add information and comments to a talk page... Test. I will have all peer reviews posted by April 15th.
Peer Review
[edit]Hello Jcolls4! I have reviewed GreenMacaw's article, and I will also review your article.
Here is my feedback:
The introduction sentence is very efficient. I don't have any edits here!
I found the wiki page for Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, so you can link your in-text reference here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_Tanabe_Pharma
Just from looking at various different wiki pages, it seems as though people link words more than once. That is, for example, antibody would be linked to the antibody page every time it is used. Just a suggestion, and easy to do.
The first line of the development section, seems to be more in line with the follow section, as it describes the manner in which it is used. The last sentence in the development section seems to potentially be a better first sentence for that section. I think this would make more sense but I could be misinterpreting what "development" refers to.
For the Uveitis section, is there any other literature you could add? This would be beneficial.
Overall, this is a really cool topic, and you have done a good job with it. With some minor improvement and inclusion of additional information I think it will be all set!
Let me know if you have any questions.