User talk:Jcollomosse

December 2018

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Barcode. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 22:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alexf. It is unclear to me why adding two links to cite the relevant US patemts to this barcode and one link to the peer reviewed, published academic paper describing this barcode are considered spam links by you. Perhaps it is because the latter links to a resource on my own academic website?

I note you made several judgements to Wikipedia contributions last night this one within just a few tens of seconds. Perhaps in haste you did not notice that the final link, which was made to my own academic website, is a genuine research paper and is linked in this way to avoid posting the more authoritative link to the ACM Digital Library which is behind a paywall. That official link is

https://doi.org/10.1145/1411759.1411782

It is common for academics to share accepted preprints of their articles via their University web pages in this way to improve open access to science. Jcollomosse (talk) 06:34, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing (CVSSP) (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No WP:INDEPENDENT sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing (CVSSP) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing (CVSSP), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 17:47, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jcollomosse! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Kvng (talk) 17:47, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing (CVSSP)

Hello, Jcollomosse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 11:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]