User talk:Jcautilli

Welcome!

Hello, Jcautilli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Natural language procedures, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! andy (talk) 16:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Natural language procedures

A tag has been placed on Natural language procedures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 16:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Integrative behavioral couples therapy, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Timneu22 · talk 12:38, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jcautilli. You have new messages at Talk:Licensed behavior analysts.
Message added 17:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

July 2010

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Machine learning. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 05:15, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of organization

That may well be true, but the place to report it is in the article on the organization itself. Not on every related article. The Association for Computing Machinery also has such special interest groups, but they are not inserted into every related article. It's the act of doing that addition to multiple articles that is spamming or promotion. Simply list all the special interest groups in the article on the organization. Yworo (talk) 13:06, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think it would be better to do the reverse. Reporting groups that have further interest is stimulating and not prmoting the agency. These agencies are not private companies but non-profit academic centers to facilitate learning 72.92.4.43 (talk) 14:51, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

These are academic institutions to facilitate learning. It is like advertising for thefree libraryJcautilli (talk) 14:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even good non-profit academic institutions should not be promoted on wikipedia. And you shouldn't really be using articles about them as a way to promote your own writings. You're probably too much of an insider to be trying to influence policy on these things. See WP:COI. Dicklyon (talk) 03:20, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was giving a place to find more information. Jcautilli (talk) 19:51, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]