User talk:Jcarter2000@yahoo.com

Welcome!

Hello, Jcarter2000@yahoo.com, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! BD2412 T 21:19, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. Tool2Die4 (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 24, 2008 You contacted me as IP address 65.101.94.18. With respect, I am not vandalizing anything. You are guarding the Death Proof article like it's your personal property, including wholesale deletion of content, which is also contrary to the rules you cite to justify your actions. It's good information I've added, and not anything unlike that found in the Wikipedia articles for other Tarantino films. If it's form that poses a problem, then please be constructive and helpful rather than territorial and vindictive. Perhaps some arbitration is necessary? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcarter2000@yahoo.com (talk • contribs) 17:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

For your own sake, take a look at WP:CIVIL. Personal attacks and immature behavior are not tolerated on Wikipedia. Tool2Die4 (talk) 20:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I stand by any remark or action I have undertaken. You first accused me of ignoring Wikipedia policy, while you yourself did the same, to-wit, blanket deletion over active reconstruction. Then you accused me of vandalism, after I undertook to comply with the relevant Wikipedia policy. Now, despite my pointing out the specific provision of Wikipedia policy that allows the subject portion of the article, you're hell-bent on tagging it as inappropriate. In my opinion, when valid content is stricken on the basis of form, rather than substance, and with no interest in discussing the merits, it's simple, subjective censorship. Jcarter2000@yahoo.com (talk) 21:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]