User talk:Jbts11

Welcome!

Hello, Jbts11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jeff Blake. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Jeff Blake constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. --Gnowor^T_C 19:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Jeff Blake. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. --Gnowor^T_C 19:10, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jeff Blake. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Next time you revert it, I'm going to have to report you for a 3RR violation. Just an FYI. Feel free to justify your removal of content on the talk page. --Gnowor^T_C 19:11, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you think the text should be removed from the Jeff Blake article, you must explain why on Talk:Jeff Blake. If you do so, I will be glad to remove, amend, or anything else appropriate that needs done. However, removing the text without explanation is disruptive; further removal will lead to your account being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 19:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Result of the 3RR case

Hello Jbts11. Please see WP:AN3#User:Jbts11 reported by User:Gnowor (Result: Warned). You are warned against continuing to remove a section from the article without first getting consensus of other editors on the Talk page. If you do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EdJohnston (talk) 23:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]