User talk:Jboyler

No one loves me.

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hey there, Jboyler, and welcome to our great encyclopedia, which currently has more than 6,914,979 articles! Even with this large number, all of your contributions are important (including the small ones), and I hope you like the place and decide to stay! Here's a few starting tips for you:

You might want to check out the welcome page.
Then you can have a look at our guidelines.
After that, you can see here for a cheatsheet on editing pages (for a bigger list, see here).

After reading all this (or even just glimpsing at it), I can understand that you might feel apprehensive about editing and contributing articles, for fear of making a mistake. But don't worry too much about mistakes; after all, you're new. Instead, everyone here encourages you to be bold! If you need help with anything, feel free to leave me a message, or you can put {{helpme}} on your talk page, and someone will show up shortly to give you a hand.

One last thing: when leaving a message on someone's talk page, don't forget to put four "tildes" (~~~~) to automatically sign your name.

Happy Editing! -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 18:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Dokdo on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

As for your above comment on this talk page, see my user page at the top-right corner :-) -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 18:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure your comments do not violate WP:CIVIL. Keep cool when the editing gets hot. Thank you. -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 18:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Dokdo page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 18:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Dokdo. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Endroit 18:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is Your Last Warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Dokdo, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 18:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank this page since it contains warnings on it; this is a violation of our policy. Thank you. -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 18:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking warnings is not a violation of policy, but if you continue to edit war over your insertion of a silly tag in inappropriate tone, I will block you. Kusma (討論) 18:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} .

Sandstein 18:57, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User pages

User Pages are considered public space, so you can't simply blank them. --DanielCD 01:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your personal attack by e-mail

This is in reply to your e-mail:

I'm extremely disappointed that you chose to block my edits rather than attempting to discuss the problem with me in any sort of rational way. I'm also very confused as to why my talk page has been locked for choosing to remove warnings, while others have removed warnings with no consequence. The behavior I've observed on the part of the admins today has been very self-serving and hypocritical.

But the fact that you're an officer must explain why you feel like you can be an arrogant piece of shit to anyone who disagrees with you.

Further personal attacks will not help your cause in the least. In fact, they will get you another block without further warning if you persist in them. You have received ample warnings about your vandalism, there was no need for more discussion. In the future, just behave well and you will have no problems with administrators. As to the protection issue, I'll discuss it with the protecting admin. Sandstein 07:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Jboyler! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Kamope · talk · contributions 00:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting help
Frequently asked questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Building consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

== ! ==

Jboyler, do not remove discussions from talk pages. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kamope · talk · contributions 00:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kamope, could you cite policy that does not allow users to remove discussion fro their own userpage? Navou ^banter / _{review me} 00:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It should come under Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines; it's a discussion page like any other. Nothing says it is the user's property to do with as they please. Other admins need to see the messages posted here. --DanielCD 01:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for personal attacks and continued vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru ^talk 02:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

I don't know what you are talking about. When I blank my page the material all goes to an archive. You are not looking closely enough to know what you are talking about. Any reverts I make have to do with the personal material I've placed at the top of the page or if I'm moving messages wrongly placed at the top of the message chain. Before you can use the word hypocrite, you need to have some more solid info.

No one is here to harass you. We simply ask you not to do vandalism or blank this page. We need these pages to communicate with each other. All you have to do is stop blanking the page.

NOW: you CAN archive the page and remove all these messages. That would give you a blank page and a fresh start. I'll even help you with it if you'd like. No one is here to be your enemy. If you'd like help learning some of the ediquette of using Wikipedia, I would be glad to mentor you a bit. We can put any conflict behind us and start fresh. Just let me know on my talk page. --DanielCD 03:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zombie chicken

The article Zombie chicken has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unknown term, possible joke

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ► RATEL ◄ 01:07, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]