User talk:Jazyfko

Nomination of Michael Pollack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Pollack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Pollack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. §FreeRangeFrog 00:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on that article. Anyway... WhisperToMe (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

For evidence of the pictures that you uploaded, please contact OTRS. Please see Commons:Commons:OTRS for more information WhisperToMe (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Michael A. Pollack.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Michael A. Pollack.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Michael-Pollack-Main-Photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Michael-Pollack-Main-Photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 04:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thank you! WhisperToMe (talk) 21:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

J Mark Martin

as you say, I deleted the article on this pastor in November 2010, on the basis of insufficient assertion of notability. perhaps I gave inadequate weight to the statements in the text, but it seemed to me then, and indeed seems to me now, that being the leader of a church in Phoenix with a membership of only 12,000 - less than 1% of the population of Phoenix - is not a post of great significance. It may be that his importance was not adequately emphasized in the article; certainly in my opinion it was not.

If you choose to write a new article about this gentleman then it will, after this length of time, be considered on its merits, assuming that it does not consist only of the same text again. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]