User talk:Jayy4life
Speedy deletion of Butta Créame
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Butta Créame requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. carelesshx talk 22:56, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
LeToya
[edit]
Please do not remove links, as you did to LeToya. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. -- Template:uw-error2 --> - boulinou (talk) 01 January 2011 (UTC)
January 2011
[edit]
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to LeToya Luckett, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. You have now done this twice, at the same time adding external links that do not meet community standards, and all without any explanation or discussion. Ckatzchatspy 21:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- Note that you twice reverted the page, removing valid templates without explanation or improvement and restoring external links that had been removed under the guideline. On both occasions, you did not add any sort of explanation. The proper approach would have been to make your changes to the infobox without the other changes. --Ckatzchatspy 23:55, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)