User talk:Jaysuschris

Welcome from Redwolf24

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 (Talk) 02:24, 2 August 2005 (UTC) The current date and time is 22 November 2024 T 15:12 UTC.[reply]

P.S. I like messages :-P

Bob Vander Plaats

Thanks for backing me up. Great work on the rewrite too. :) Reyk 06:19, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

10 Christian biographies nominated for deletion

Thanks for voicing your opinion on several of the Christian biographies that A.J.A. nominated for deletion, yesterday. Here are several others that could use your input:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Louisiana_Baptist_University_people_%28second_nomination%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ron_Moseley http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mike_Randall http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_Combs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Neal_Weaver http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Greg_Baker http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daniel_Dorim_Kim

God bless, --Jason Gastrich 22:14, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm letting this rest. I made my point to the nominator, hopefully the articles that need to stand can stand on their own. - Jaysus Chris 04:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No Personal Attacks, 1st warning

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy: There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be blocked for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks,

Your puerile perseveration on omitting any mention of Karen Nussle's association with a foreign-owned lobbying firm, and the fact that she is the guilty co-respondant in Nussle's lurid, adultery-drenched, publically-reported divorce is positively puerile. Your 'Screen name 'User:Jaysuschris|Jaysus Chris' must be seen as blasphemous, in that you clearly have a warped view of the Ten Commandments. Unlike the rather strange Roy Moore, you seem to believe registered Republicans only take this as a casual 'best form' code of ethics, and not as something written in stone: it is clear you believe any or all of the Ten Commandments may be disobeyed whenever it suits your purpose.

Now, go an cry to an admin. --FourthAve 06:32, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS. If you want to see what a real de novo article looks like, try and attempt to vandalize Range Creek. I write a number of these; my edits are also equally interesting. I suspect your 'original articles' are of the Britney Spears variety.--FourthAve 06:54, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go read what a personal attack is, then let's talk. For the ammount of venom you spew on political pages, I and several others, have handled ourselves quite professionally.

If you want to include information about a lobbying group put it where it belongs. Start a page on the lobbying group. - Jaysus Chris 18:28, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed some politically biased statements from the article on the University of Dubuque that were added by the FourthAve user. JesseG 19:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whack Job warning

Your pseudo-Religious entirely whack-job political nut-case postings are tedious. Your patent sock-puppety is egregious. Please, go weep on an Admin's shoulder, and let him discipline someone so fecalocephalically depraved as you. --FourthAve 07:44, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear you fear bringing this to the attention of an Admin, in that you clearly understand how severely he/she might discipline you. You are a vandal, something characteristically Republican, a typical right wing whack job, someone who should be banned from wikipedia. Again, go cry on an Admin's shoulder.--FourthAve 08:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you get this stuff? - Jaysus Chris 08:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your partisan vandalism

You are clearly a whack-job Republican. Your religous beliefs are particularly offensive. I think you'd be happier as a Muslim, in that Islam belives killing Americans is a good thing.

You are mentally ill.--FourthAve 09:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Sorry

Jayuschris, I'm sorry about all the stuff you've had to put up with over these past few days. To be accused by another user of everything from mental illness to sexual perversion is just inexcusable, and I'm sorry for all the emotional stress this may cause you.
JesseG 20:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it comes with the turf. Thanks. - Jaysus Chris 04:19, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Nussle

Having looked at the RfC and FourthAve's response, I think you should consider taking this to arbitration. I'm a clerk to the arbitration committee, so if you need help with this just ask. --Tony Sidaway 15:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno...looking over User:FourthAves edits, especially directed to this editor, may mean a block while we await arbitration. How long has this nonsense been going on?--MONGO 03:38, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow...sorry about that...I'll look over the Rfc...it is continues either myself or Tony will be happy to intervene. Tony is a bit nicer than I am about this sort of thing, which is probably the right approach, but if I hear of anymore abuse...maybe arbitration is necessary...it's great that you are patient enough to go the Rfc route first, but some of what I saw was rather intolerable. Keep me posted.--MONGO 04:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't call FourthAve's edits vandalizm. It will make your case stronger if you refer to them as POV edits. Agathoclea 11:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/FourthAve

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/FourthAve. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/FourthAve/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/FourthAve/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Johnleemk | Talk 15:28, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration

I have been party to all of your edits. I assume the opposite is true for you. Wanna fight? May dbachmann assume you'll vandalize the Corded ware culture article?

Actually, you are not the rabid-right teen-pervert troll I assumed you were. You are just, well, strange. --FourthAve 11:13, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On politicians (Whose articels you frequent)

You may find the template {{activepolitician}} useful. If you have improvements to make, I'm welcome to hear them or see them in action. Thanx. 68.39.174.238 02:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/FourthAve/Evidence

Right now, I'm just collecting evidence. I will be reviewing all of your edits and all of your mail. Reply there or talk to Admin User talk:Tony Sidaway.

It's not that I think you are a troll, but the issue is Republican Capitol Hill staffers vandalizing political articles and my deplorable response to what I thought this was an example.

If you have additional thoughts, talk to me. --FourthAve 08:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS initial investigation seems to clear you of sockpuppetry charges, but there are other issues. You seem to admit your user name is offensive.--FourthAve 08:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/FourthAve

This arbitration case has closed. FourthAve is banned from Wikipedia for a year, and is placed on personal attack parole, probation, and general probation. This will be enforced by block. I have carried out the one-year-ban in my capacity as an administrator. For further details, please see the arbitration case. On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 15:48, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hamburg Inn No. 2

G'day, noticed you mentioned on the talk page of the article it is a work in progress and some sources are coming along... well, am curious if you know of any? They would be very handy. Cheers. Mathmo ^Talk 11:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Unsacred Hearts

An article that you have been involved in editing, Unsacred Hearts, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unsacred Hearts. Thank you.

I am notifying you because you deprodded the article. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 00:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]