User talk:Jayscott996

The link to Loop 526 is red. Please add information about Loop 526 so the link will turn blue. Thanks, Jay Scott Jayscott996 (talk) 19:47, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Red loop links

The loop links that are red are: Loop 142 Loop 143 Loop 144 (former) Loop 145 Loop 146 (former) Loop 149 (former)... And so on Jayscott996 (talk) 20:09, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Texas State Highway Loop 524

The article Texas State Highway Loop 524 has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Texas State Highway Loop 526

Hello, Jayscott996,

Thanks for creating Texas State Highway Loop 526! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of U.S. Route 59 Business (Wharton, Texas)

The article U.S. Route 59 Business (Wharton, Texas) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stubs

Please stop mass creating unsourced stubs. Praxidicae (talk) 14:49, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will try not to mass creating unsourced stubs. Jayscott996 (talk) 02:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

County roads in Carlton County, Minnesota draft

I've made a draft for the list of county roads in Carlton County, Minnesota. What's next? Jayscott996 (talk) 01:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

County roads in Meeker County, Minnesota draft

I've made a draft for the list of county roads in Meeker County, Minnesota. What's next? Jayscott996 (talk) 15:03, 22 October 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jayscott996 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27254 was submitted on Oct 22, 2019 16:45:00. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:45, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 17:58, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the above notice so you can appeal; the actual reason for the block is in the block log. 331dot (talk) 17:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jayscott996 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want the edit articles again Yamla (talk) 20:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jayscott996 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am addressing the problem because I am 🚫 by a administrator. My reason is that the error is for Wikipedia articles where red and it 🚫 me from editing them. If I am unblocked, I want to edit as much as possible. I am apologized for what I've ✔ and I'm sorry, it won't happen again. Jayscott996 (talk) 02:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jayscott996 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My reason to be unblock is so that I can edit again without any future problems. Jayscott996 (talk) 00:07, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've recently evaded your block. Please read the terms of the standard offer. If you can go six months without editing English Wikipedia, we will consider unblocking you. You must not create any new accounts or edit while logged out. You can still edit Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata, and Wikipedia in other languages, including Simple English Wikipedia. Constructive edits that you make on these sister websites will count in your favor. But you need to stop evading your block if you want to edit in peace. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:53, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Update on the list of county roads in Meeker County, Minnesota

I added some more county roads and I put some more information about them. I also added the start and end points. Jayscott996 (talk) 18:18, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It says that I was blocked due to: "multiple blocks against your account and/or IP address"

I wanna know why the error message says: "There are multiple blocks against your account and/or IP address". What does that mean? Jayscott996 (talk) 17:38, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]