User talk:Jaybee625/sandbox

Peer Review

If you plan on talking about how lightweight quills are used for defence underneath the structure section, I suggest having the general defence section following immediately afterwards. I’m not sure if this is what you were planning on doing, but I think it has a better overall flow.

I also recommend making changes to the layout of the original article to make it more coherent. I think you should swap out the subheading of quills with habitat and make the quills section a heading of its own underneath, then add the defence section after like I said previously.

However, I believe what you plan on contributing to the article is great. The only suggestion I would make in that sense is to provide contexts in which the porcupine would emit the different defence responses. I hope this helps and I look forward to seeing your final article! Jessicabadcock (talk) 17:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback! I was planning to place defence above quills and making quills a subheading. I'll definitely research when the defence behaviours are used and add that to my draft. Jaybee625 (talk) 13:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review (Hayley)

Your thoughts are very well organized in your outline and it looks like you are off to a great start! Your article draft is very coherent thus far and I have found little grammatical errors. I would suggest using the term "nocturnal" in your draft paragraph in place of "active in the night" as it is more concise. You could then link the term to its wikipedia page if a reader would like further information on this term. You have a considerable amount of information from reliable sources which is great. I would recommend searching for a couple more sources as you continue to write your article, perhaps having ~5 in total so that the article is not biased towards a particular perspective. Lastly, I was curious whether there is any literature explaining the chemical mechanisms in which the quill defence response is triggered (i.e. is it triggered by a neurotransmitter, hormone, etc.). It would be interesting to include something along those lines in a brief statement in the paragraph on quills if you can find sources to support it. Overall, I really enjoyed reading your draft article about this topic and I am excited to read your final article:) HayleyMercer (talk) 17:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi! I did change my wording to nocturnal and hyperlinked it to it's own Wikipedia page. That's a great idea and I wouldn't have done that without your suggestion! I am currently still looking for another source to reference but I did find one on chemical/antibiotic mechanisms of quills which I will include in the quill section.Jaybee625 (talk) 13:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

K.Lip peer review

You have chosen a really interesting topic and I am definitely looking forward in reading the final draft. Your draft so far is looking very good. Some recommendations I have are finding some more sources and hyperlinking words to make it easier for readers to navigate through Wikipedia pages. Elaborating on teeth clattering and body shivering and how it may deter predators could be interesting. Overall a good start to the article. K.Lip (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestions, I did elaborate more on both teeth chattering and body shivering. I will continue to hyperlink words that I think would help any readers further understand my section. Jaybee625 (talk) 13:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)