User talk:Jayarava

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your recent additions to the Prajñāpāramitā article. :-)

Tengu800 02:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

my pleasure. Jayarava (talk) 09:00, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (William Henry Webster) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating William Henry Webster, Jayarava!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 12:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jayarava. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lokaksema (Buddhist monk), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Harrison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk: Heart Sutra

Hello Jayarava, I saw the dispute on Talk Heart Sutra. Please see WP:TALK, WP:PA and Wikipedia:Dispute resolution for more info on relevant wikipedia policies and guidelines. There is also an essay about Wikipedia:Expert editors. JimRenge (talk) 14:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'd been taking a light touch approach in the article and trying to make it clear in talk that research is ongoing. Then suddenly I was being bullied and there were multiple attempts to hack my account. In reality the article is mostly bullshit written by religious fanatics to make themselves feel superior. With this level of hate I won't be participating any more. Let the article be shitty and controlled by fanatics. I have better things to do. Jayarava (talk) 07:19, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have also received a message from wikipedia that someone tried to login into my acount. I wondered if this might be an attack related to my recent edits. However, more than 400 000 accounts were attacked in waves in the last few days, I am convinced this is no specific attack against you or me [1]. The admin you asked for support has beeen inactive for a month. If you need help/advice, you might consider to ask uninvolved, experienced editors at the WP:TEAHOUSE, the good-will space inside wikipedia. JimRenge (talk) 11:26, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. I'm not interested in disputes. No one else seems interested either. Such articles are inevitably captured by the fanatics, its just something we have to live with. I have better things to do. Best of luck. Jayarava (talk) 11:51, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dijing Jingwulue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fangshan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daoxuan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaozong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heart Sutra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for identifying the now deleted article Edward Conze as an unambiguous copyright violation

Good evening (in my time zone) Jayarava,

Thank you for identifying the now deleted article Edward Conze as an unambiguous copyright violation. I have now deleted it in its entirety, as there was no revision whatsoever in its history that addressed the copyright violation.

History of the article

It was created on 19:00, March 19, 2004 by Shantavira (talk · contribs) with the footnote "Adapted from Sangharakshita, Great Buddhists of the Twentieth Century, with permission"
There were about 124 edits on the article, mostly adding maintenance templates or wikilinks to other articles.

Content of the article

The website it was copied from is here, which clearly states "© Sangharakshita 1996".
This appears to have been excerpted or posted online about a printed book, "Great Buddhists of the Twentieth Century", old nine digit SNB 0904766802, thirteen digit ISBN 9780-904766-80-6.
The content of the now deleted article was a word-for-word cut-and-paste from pages 19 to 21 of that pdf file.

Thank you again. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:46, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have begun a new entry for Edward Conze as he is a major figure in the field of Buddhism Studies. Jayarava (talk) 12:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jayarava. I was very new to Wikipedia then.--Shantavira|^{feed me} 13:11, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A good outcome here all round. Thank you both again. (As an self-identified Eng Lit nerd, I'm well aware that the 1948 winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature sorta kinda passed off a translation of the Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad as his own work in The Waste Land), but that is a discussion for another day... ) Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:57, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Heart Sutra II

Hello Jayarava, I have limited my input to the removal of obvious NPOV problems because this is one of about 2000 Buddhism related articles on my watchlist. The wikipedia habitat differs from the academic scene (one example is WP:OR), please see Wikipedia:Expert editors for additional info. In disputes like Nattier/Harada it is often helpful to cite reviews or tertiary sources to determine due weight (WP:DUE). JimRenge (talk) 14:21, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite aware that this is not an academic environment, believe me. Not that I have any special affinity for academia, I'm not an academic and never have been. The trouble is that there is little or no tertiary scholarship on the Heart Sutra. Literally, no Western scholar before me has reviewed Nattier's work - even acknowledgement that her article has been published is grudging. As far as scholars actively researching the text, to my knowledge I'm currently the only one. Matt Orsborn is back working on the Aṣṭasāhasrikā. My published opinion, as the sole representative of Western scholarship who has engaged with Nattier's thesis is that Nattier did not go far enough in stating her case. I've added considerably to the evidence in at least three of my five articles since 2015 - including conclusive proof of the text's Chinese origins in the article just published. But having published articles is no advantage if people refuse to read them or even to acknowledge that they exist. Hakada won't be reviewed in English because he only writes in Japanese and is completely unknown outside Japan. No one cites him on any subject as far as I can tell. Not even the Japanese articles that I have seen in translation mention Hakada. In effect, I am being asked to meet a much higher standard than User: Hanbud is and meanwhile he or she effectively controls the content of the article. Jayarava (talk) 11:05, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jayarava. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Will Buckingham

Hello, Jayarava,

Thanks for creating Will Buckingham! I edit here too, under the username Eagleash and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Lacks WP:SIGCOV in independent reliable sources. May not pass WP:NPROF or WP:GNG

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Eagleash}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Eagleash (talk) 10:01, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your Heart Sutra article

Not directly related to Wikipedia business, but I read your 2019 article on the history of the Heart Sutra recently. The issue of the production of digests and collections is of interest to me in the context of the development of sutra literature- I don't know if you've had a chance to see some of Anne Blackburn from Cornell's work on 'monastic notebooks' in the Sri Lankan tradition. Not directly related to the history of the Heart Sutra, but I can see a possible allegory of sorts in the story of Xuanzang being taught the Heart Sutra via oral translation. Making digest copies as part of the training of novice monks seems to be a very old translation, and the Khuddakapatha seems to provide an example of such a text being incorporated into the canonical tradition. It seems inevitable that particularly popular or pithy digests might take on a life of their own and become part of popular recitation or liturgical practice. Allegorical interpretations obviously are subject to speculation, but I can see a story like the Xuanzang transmission developing out of an environment where the Heart Sutra had become part of popular oral practice after being excerpted from its sources, but without the specific pedigree that would allow it to be accepted as obviously canonical. Anyhow, just wanted to say that I appreciated your work and share a few stray connections I made. --Spasemunki (talk) 22:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]