User talk:Jayakumar RG

Safen

I've heard this used in spoken language. I only added it after I saw it in the Merriam-Webster dictionary. It obviously needs clean up and should be marked as such not for deletion. The dictionary link is a paywall but is the first item in the search below:

https://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Asafen

Porco-esphino (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Try [1]. This is the dictionary project by WMF. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and cannot be used for dictionary definitions. Jayakumar RG (talk) 08:00, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Traxon Technologies

Greeting, I was importing the materials and then in the process of re-writing the materials when you tagged it as spam, if you have time you can take a look again and see if you still think that it is good for speedy deletion. Thanks.

rimsky.cheng — Preceding undated comment added 04:04, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

db-nonsense

Should be used for pages that don't contain anything intelligable such as keyboard mashing. I changed your speedy deletion-nonsense to db-org. See WP:G1 for info on 'nonsense'. Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 07:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Thanks for the clarificationJayakumar RG (talk) 08:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kalpavriksha (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rayamajhi may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{issues|{{cleanup-reorganise|date=May 2014}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Jayakumar RG, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! :) (talk) 12:09, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

HCR Rank Formula

Hello, Jayakumar RG

Previously, you were giving reason that article is not explaining significance & now, you are saying that my article is duplicate to a wiki article. Could you tell me which article of wikipedia is being duplicated by 'HCR Rank Formula' which I created??

This one: HCR's Rank Formua. And why are you recreating a deleted article? Please try this. Jayakumar RG (talk) 10:30, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayakumar RG

The page 'HCR's Rank Formula' you tagged two times for deletion, is a case study & intellectual information.

It is a case study & hence it is sufficient to explain about the its concept, method, significance & applications etc. It is not necessary to explain why certain formula or theory is significant for Wikipedia.

For instance, Take an Wikipedia article 'Pythagorean Theorem'

It only explains its scope, method/procedure, significance, applications etc. It does not explain why it is suitable Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hcr1991 (talk • contribs) 10:43, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Add your comments at the bottom of the talk page, not top. I have answered your question at the article talk page. -- Jayakumar RG (talk) 10:47, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is because Pythogras theorem is notable. Is your topic? If yes, please establish it. Wikipedia does not publish all available academic theses. This is an encyclopedia. -- Jayakumar RG (talk) 10:43, 3 May 2014 (UTC) (Copied from Talk:HCR's Rank Formula which was not a good place to reply brcause it gets deleted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:06, 3 May 2014 (UTC))[reply]

wtf y does every dang article i make have 2 be deleted Hulkster2 (talk) 14:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sreeraman chira

Hi. Sorry, but you can't use A7 (significance) on paddy fields. It's for people, named animals, events and web content. An Irishman called Paddy Field might be tagged A7, but not a rice field. Peridon (talk) 17:07, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've prodded it. (And added an end to the small setting RHaworth used above.) Peridon (talk) 17:11, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, sorry about that one. --Jayakumar RG (talk) 17:17, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

airbackup proposed deletion

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from airbackup, which you proposed for deletion. I am leaving this message here to notify you about it. Hello! The article has just been shortened and parts that may have appeared promotional have been removed in that process. The article now aligns with articles of other backup software. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to it. Instead, feel free to list the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.87.155.2 (talk) 09:55, 8 May 2014 (UTC) -- Hi again! Wasn't logged in when I made this change, sorry about that.[reply]

Not tagging it again :) --Jayakumar RG (talk) 10:29, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC How to Kill a Dragon was accepted

How to Kill a Dragon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

BZTMPS ★ · (talk? contribs?) 18:38, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kalpavriksha (disambiguation)

Hello, Jayakumar RG. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kalpavriksha (disambiguation), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mabalu (talk) 14:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Objection to proposed deletion of University of Toronto United Nations Society

Hi Jayakumar RG,

I wanted to make my case objecting against the proposed deletion of the article University of Toronto United Nations Society. The club functions as a separate and distinct organization that represents the University of Toronto. The club does not fit on the University of Toronto page because there are no other clubs that are featured. The club has a rich history on its own. Please help suggest how to improve page and I can certainly do that.

Agmateo (talk) 06:17, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Since WP is a general encyclopedia, creating articles about very specialized topics like a university club may not be encouraged. You keep mentioning that the club has a rich history, whereas it was only founded in 2002. I dont think that this is sufficiently notable to get an article on its own. --Jayakumar RG (talk) 08:06, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioned you in some WikiProjects

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that I've dropped your name at a few WikiProjects that have to do with the subjects in the How to Kill a Dragon book. I've asked for help with the article, but I also asked for them to help you in general as far as editing goes. I hope you don't mind. It's just that I've found that academia related articles can often be difficult to edit, especially if you're new and/or a student, as you have to find a way to phrase things without doing copyvio but also in a way that doesn't come across as WP:OR. I've seen some beautifully written articles by people that are wonderful and informative... but don't really fit our editing NPOV/encyclopedic tone. That's part of the reason I've stayed mostly with mainstream fiction and non-fiction titles, since the academic texts are harder to write up. I definitely admire that you're trying to tackle such weighty subjects, as we need more people willing to do this. In any case, I mostly just wanted to let you know I asked for people to help you out. The article for the book shoudl have enough to remain and hopefully we'll have some more people chipping in to help soon. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:33, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know how to express my gratitude to you :). Thanks for expanding the article so much and helping to save it from deletion. Yes, I do think I am incompetent with wp policies and need a mentor. Jayakumar RG (talk) 15:37, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Dont make deletion tags to user pages. It is just the information of user and is allowed in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jin khatama (talk • contribs) 19:43, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are confusing between user page and article. This is an article. This is a user page. Jayakumar RG (talk) 19:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted speedy deletion tag on Rainbow Foods inc.

I've reverted your speedy deletion tag on this article. I had tagged it myself, but withdrew it after the article author made a good faith attempt to add references. I've working with the author and will work to improve the sourcing myself. --Finngall ^talk 04:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

I appreciate it. Hkhk007 (talk) 06:27, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! :) Jayakumar RG (talk) 16:40, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contest deletion of Spirit Rider: The Series of Kanesha's Heart

I am new to creating pages on wikipedia. How can I better explain the importance of including a page about a young adult fantasy novel? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agracemartin (talk • contribs) 15:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contest deletion of Spirit Rider: The Series of Kanesha's Heart

I am new to writing wiki pages, so could you instead tell me how to include better content to increase the importance of the Spirit Rider page? It is a young adult fantasy novel and students need to have ready access to information about its plot and publication.

A. Grace Martin (talk) 15:28, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A. Grace Martin

The important thing about creating an article on Wikipedia is to make sure the subject is notable. If you are new to creating articles, you can start with AfC. You have included links which act as references for this article- those links must preferably be third-party sources, and not self published. If there are news items that attest the notability of your article's subject, please include them in the article. Jayakumar RG (talk) 16:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! That helps a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agracemartin (talk • contribs) 19:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RSS

Thanks friend; syntax was never my strongest suit. Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :) Jayakumar RG (talk) 18:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --Acetotyce (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination

Hey! Can I ask if you could please expand on your nomination at the AfD for List of celebrity baby names? Even if arguments are being made further down, by you and other editors, editors often !vote as a reaction to only the nomination, and the nomination does not currently give a particularly persuasive argument. Thanks!--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:09, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've given a summary there based on recent arguments. Jayakumar RG (talk) 02:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Jayakumar RG. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nthep (talk) 09:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Rollback

Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:

Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:20, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Jayakumar RG, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Information about STiki, including:
- Using STiki and its hotkeys
- Comparison with other tools
Information about vandalism on Wikipedia

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 20:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SOMNIUM Disambiguation.

Hi Jayakumar,

I was wondering why you proposed deletion of my disambiguation for Somnium?

Thanks,

Dohara1990 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dohara1990 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dohara, welcome to Wikipedia. I removed your company from the disambiguation list partly because it does not have an article of its own. A disambiguation page is used to navigate between different wikipedia articles with similiar names. You can see WP:Notability and WP:Disambiguation for more details. Jayakumar RG (talk) 13:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sistine Chapel edits

Hi Jayakumar! I noticed you've reverted recent vandalism to Sistine Chapel. Not sure if its on your watchlist or whether you were just recent edits patrolling at the time. I thought I should let you know that I've requested pending changes protection to reduce the level of vandalism. To approve edits you would need the reviewer right. If you have any ongoing interest in the article you may want to request it. Cheers, St★lwart¹¹¹ 05:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Committee sanctions

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Bladesmulti (talk) 04:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Before you make another revert, first take a look at Talk:Vedanga Jyotisha, establish consensus before altering the long standing content to something that is not supported anywhere. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also reverted you on Anil Agarwal (businessman) [2]. Don't turn long standing pages, with significant contribution history into redirect without any consensus. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:58, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another problematic redirect.[3] I have replied on Talk:Ram_Karmabhoomi#Redirect. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:08, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[4] I had to recover some of the maintanence tags(e.g. {{citation needed}}) and remove forum links. If you cannot cite citation to the information, it's fine but don't remove the maintenance tags. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:15, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. the panda ₯’ 18:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have also been forced to remove the Rollback right from this account for now. This is not your first time edit-warring, and such action is unacceptable on Wikipedia. Please spend at least 6 months working on removing actual vandalism, and following WP:BRD before requesting the permission again the panda ₯’ 18:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since I haven't used rollback throughout any dispute, I don't understand why rollback had to be removed. I never used rollback for anything other than reverting vandalism. Jayakumar RG (talk) 02:54, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editors who edit-war using any tool are ineligible for Rollback the panda ₯’ 09:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed other users who edit-warred and got blocked, but their user rights were not changed(rollback and reviewer). I think removing my rollback is overly harsh, since I have spent considerable time reverting vandalism using Stiki, after getting rollback and there has been no complaint regarding my use of rollback. In fact, using Stiki is what I do a lot on WP nowadays and taking it away is as good as kicking me out of WP. I understand that I went too far with the Anil Agarwal article, but I didn't really edit war anywhere else. I informed the other user in the article talk page about the reason I wanted to convert the article it to a redirect and I thought I was following prior consensus. Jayakumar RG (talk) 13:24, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also promise not to edit-war henceforth under any circumstance. Jayakumar RG (talk) 13:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What does "reviewer" have to do with anything here? The fact that you only RECENTLY obtained the privilege, and violated a key tenet of Wikipedia so quickly shows that you never should have been granted it, yet. I'd be willing to unblock based on your promise not to edit-war again, but return of the rollback right will require you to follow what I have stated above the panda ₯’ 18:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The user I am talking about also received the rights recently. Besides, rollback is only used to revert vandalism and it has nothing to do with edit warring. I still don't see the point of removing rollback since I have considerable history of using rollback rights for the right reasons. Jayakumar RG (talk) 03:35, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another fault of yours: you keep spinning the same wheels. It gets very annoying for others and they quit responding. Even if 10 other people are reading your conversation, they are likely not going to respond because they don't want to get into a lame argument. At this stage, you should take break for some days and come up with new argument and better explanations. You have been told at least 3 times on this particular section that whoever has rollback right, they must know when and where to revert edits, for one, you didn't know how notable that multi-billionaire is, and there's nothing bad in keeping a page about him on this website.

It is better if you just drop these issues, and create some new articles or expand small articles. But if you still want to discuss about these admin actions, just file a complaint on Wikipedia:ANI. Or you could also consider a Wikipedia:RFC/ADMIN. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:59, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Anil Agarwal was a wrong call, but what about the other article- Ram karmabhoomi? Turning it into a redirect was a no-brainer, and yet you just reverted it. I opened an AfD, and you didn't even comment there. I was getting the feeling that you were being unfair. Jayakumar RG (talk) 05:25, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Raúl Fabiani

Hi there RG, from Portugal,

I know you acted in good faith when you reverted my last two good actions in this footballer's article, but I did provided two thorough summaries, hence I would like to know what "raised your eyebrow". My subsequent summary, without containing any aggressive words or akin, might have not have been all that it could.

Attentively, happy editing, sorry for any inconvenience --84.90.219.128 (talk) 18:48, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hariharasudhan(singer) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hariharasudhan(singer), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hariharasudhan(singer) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hariharasudhan(singer), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hariharasudhan(singer)

Hello Jayakumar RG. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Hariharasudhan(singer)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hariharasudhan(singer)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lor^Talk 02:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]