User talk:Jay22041995

Welcome!

Hello, Jay22041995! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 08:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Soccer in Australia

There's a couple of problems with your edits claiming that soccer is the most popular sport. To make such a claim you would need to create reference links to reliable sources in the article. Just saying in an Edit summary that such evidence exists is not enough.

In addition, you would need to go to the article's Talk page to gain consensus on a clear definition of "most popular".

Your date change is also inappropriate. A sourced accurate year is already there. HiLo48 (talk) 09:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jay22041995, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jay22041995! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sport in Australia

Your changes to that article aren't appropriate. And "most popular" is a nebulous concept. Please discuss them first on the article's Talk page. HiLo48 (talk) 10:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make any more changes to Sport in Australia without prior discussion on the article's talk page. The changes you have made so far are very dramatic and breach policy in many ways. HiLo48 (talk) 16:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne Cricket Ground

We require reliable sources. Please don't add content again without them. HiLo48 (talk) 06:18, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of most watched television broadcasts ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:53, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This joker has a crapload of 14.97.*.* edits, all the same delusional nonsense.