User talk:Javascap

Hi, thanks for your edit at WP:STUB, but you might want to read some guidelines pages first at CAT:G to a get a feel for what we're looking for in guidelines. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 04:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uncyclopedia

Can't some people take a joke..stop by above...revert war beginning.--Buster7 (talk) 22:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Gein songlist

Yes, there is a reason to remove the list of songs. In looking at what was listed, what was included was a listing of essentially non-notable songs by these groups. One band doesn't even have a Wikipedia article, only one song has its own WP article, which is a stub with one sentence of speculation in it, and one other song is only mentioned on the band page as an item of trivia. The reference to "at least two" solo albums by John 5 can't even be verified on his article page. The entire section wasn't removed because the other two paragraphs included an effort to make the content meaningful beyond a barely checkable stark listing of songs. What is intended by the paragraph I removed could have been accomplished by including one song. The trend with the WP:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography group has been to limit the listing of what essentially amounts to trivia and pop culture mention to those items which are notably and specifically about, or by, the person in question in film, tv, literature and music and to move away from having extensive and exhaustive lists of each and every time the person's name gets mileage in the entertainment field. I see no reason to retain this paragraph and can reasonably state that a consensus would easily be gained to remove it.

This article is one that is slated to be included in the Version 0.7 release of Wikipedia and this is part of the onging effort to polish and improve those articles prior to inclusion. Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That... is an excellent point, and one I was not aware of. Thank you for clairifying =). Javascap (talk) 14:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to clear it up. It's an exhaustive effort to keep those lists in a meaningful presentation. For what I think is a positive presentation of pop culture presence of a criminal, see Charles Manson. I think we've done a good job in including his pop culture presence without it deteriorating into blatant trivia. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 20:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Tiptoety ^talk 03:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for taking the time to review my request. I have read over the Vandal and Rollback policies, and think I understand what is ment in both of them. If I DO have any questions, I will make sure to ask. Have a great day! Javascap (talk) 03:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was this an error?

Hi. It looks like you had your right hand on the wrong keys when you typed this. Was this a stylish deliberate mistake or do you want to correct it? :D - Richard Cavell (talk) 10:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is what is known as a stylish "tpyo". =D. Javascap (talk) 16:20, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um, your correction still has a mistake in it. Don't worry, I've had editing days like that. - Richard Cavell (talk) 22:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page on October 14. --DieWeisseRose (talk) 07:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CNN/Sarah Palin

Just a friendly note to let you know I reverted your recent edit to Sarah Palin. Wikipedia "best practices" are that responsibility for properly sourcing material rests with the person who adds it. I'm not questioning you recollection, it's just that one's own memory is not considered a verifiable, reliable source under Wikipedia standards. Even if CNN's first call can be properly sourced, it's probably an unnecessary level of detail for this article (though I won't contest its inclusion), and is probably more appropriate for United States presidential election, 2008, if anywhere. Cheers, ----Clubjuggle ^T/C 19:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Zombie Jesus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Template:Zombie Jesus, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not add inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It is an unambiguous misrepresentation of established policy. (See section T2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zappa O Mati 19:54, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]