User talk:Javaddeniro

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:35, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reported

Since you have chosen to edit war, see here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 03:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Seljuq dynasty

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Javaddeniro reported by User:Kansas Bear (Result: Blocked). It is natural to speculate that you might not be a new editor since you already know how to issue official warning messages, doing so on your seventh edit. Anything you can do to persuade us of your good faith would be helpful. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Javaddeniro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's obviouslly clear from the trustworthy references the I have suggested The house of Seljuk has not been pure Turkic and the process of Persianization of them has been stated clearlly while the user kansas Bear is trying to make an edit war and is not answering the questions in the talk page and is asking wikipedia adminastration to block me that is obviouslly meaningless Javaddeniro (talk) 18:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Javaddeniro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have told previously that it's meaningless to block me because of editing an article but I have seen just now that you spectulate that I am not a new user because i have sent a warning , If you search kansas bear messages , firstly he sent a warning message for me later I just copied and pasted that warning in his talk page because of continuing changing my edits and giving meaningless answers in the talk page Javaddeniro (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This still does not address the reasons for your block, namely the edit warring. Huon (talk) 04:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A complaint about your edits was filed on my talk page

See User talk:EdJohnston#When an editor refuses to get the point. You can respond there if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 05:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

درخواست کمک رسانی

سلام. من دیدم در صفحه بحث زرشک درخواست کمک رسانی داده بودید. ایشون مدت هاست که فعالیت بسیار اندکی دارد. البته آن حوزه ای که نوشته مورد علاقه من نیست تا کمکتان کنم. اما اگر در صفحه بحث ویکی پروژه ایران پیام بگذارید حتما یکی از کاربران فعال نظر خواهد داد. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Iran--Seyyed(t-c) 09:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]