User talk:JavaWorks
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of RasterOp, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.leptonica.com/rasterops.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on RasterOp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi and thanks for your contributions! However, Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources per our policy on verifiability and to determine notability — that, in turn, determines whether or not a subject qualifies for an article —; anyway, self-published sources or companies' official websites are generally not considered sources. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 11:45, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article IT-Blocks, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. And by the way, nobody has proposed the article for speedy deletion, so the {{hangon}} tag is superfluous. ;) Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 13:53, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of IT-Blocks
[edit]
The article IT-Blocks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- non-notable. unable to find any WP:RS extensively about this company.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 11:55, 14 July 2015 (UTC)