User talk:JavaBroadCorp

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Conjowa Movie.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:The Conjowa Movie.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:39, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User:Mark Arsten, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 14:25, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Mark Arsten, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 14:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Mark Arsten. Moosehadley 13:27, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Zad68 13:31, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing of User Talk:Mark Arsten. You may not interfere with the User Talk pages of others like that, as it disrupts communication between editors. This indefinite block is not infinite, and if you make an unblock request stating that you understand that such editing of the User Talk pages of other editors is disruptive and will stop doing it, you may be unblocked. Zad68 13:35, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked this account from editing the talk page, as their only action was to try to link to a page made by a new account they opened as well as previously make an article on the page. I'm going to block the other account from editing their talk page as well, considering that there's a good chance that they might try to do something similar. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]