User talk:Jaspal34

Suggest

You can suggest me Jaspal34 (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of R Nait

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on R Nait requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MB 17:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

R Nait moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, R Nait, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 18:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: R Nait (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read WP:MUSICBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:R Nait and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:R Nait, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:30, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaspal34! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:30, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Jaspreetsingh6 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaspreetsingh6. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 11:40, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal for my Checkuserblock {{Unblock:|Reason=Vilioted policy of sockpuppet}} Change

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaspal34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have realized my mistake. From now on I will only use one account and I will never violate Wikipedia policies guidelines and I will also take care of sockpuppet policy

Decline reason:

Why are you appealing your block from two different accounts at the same time? I don't think you understand English Wikipedia's complex rules. You should try editing Wikipedia in your native language, then once you have experience there, maybe try making an unblock request here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #59561

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But his can I request can you please guide me Jaspal34 (talk) 07:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How** Jaspal34 (talk) 07:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you troll Wikipedia again, you may be revoking talk page access without further notice. Thank you. RanchJustIn (talk) 07:39, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jaspal34, you should follow the instructions in the box where it says appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. You will need to address why strong technical evidence links you to the account Jaspreetsingh6, including either that you also have access to the account Jaspreetsingh6 or don't. If you don't deny that you own the account Jaspreetsingh6 then you should appeal using that account instead. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:17, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamy Jazz sir how can I appeal you apart from my Talk page I can't edit anything I can't talk with you In your page because of this reason yes jaspreetsingh6 also my account but I didn't use that account for some reason but that doesn't I abused any one I never abused any account I just involved in some editing war just because my inexperienced but please sir just give me only one more chance I promised use this I not going to dispoint you

please sir unblock my I'd I beg you Jaspal34 (talk) 09:38, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You, as detailed above, need to:

Copy the following text: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
Edit your talk page (this page)
Paste it in to your talk page
Change Your reason here to why you want to be unblocked and what you would do differently. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 10:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaspal34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to improve my knowledge of Wikipedia policy and guidelines next time I didn't disappoint you. I will improve my knowledge about Wikipedia policy and guidelines and follow them so nextI will not give you a chance to complain

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:39, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Dreamy jazz sir can you please tell me when I can get my I'd access back please unblock my I'd and IP I Promised you In the future, I will take care that I do not violate any Wikipedia policies and guidelines

User:Yamla Sir so what can I do now apart from my Talk page I can't edit anything my ip address also gets blocked please unblock me atleast my ip address I will promised you In the future, I will take care that I do not violate any Wikipedia policies and guidelines please sir unblock my I'd I never abused any account I just involved in some editing war due to inexperienced and that time I also didn't know much about Wikipedia policy 😢 Jaspal34 (talk) 14:03, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be very clear. YOU are blocked. Until this block is lifted, YOU are not permitted to edit. Stop trying to edit while signed out. Stop creating even more accounts. STOP. Go and read our policies. Especially, WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Then make an unblock request on your original account, addressing your violations of our policies and guidelines. WP:GAB goes into more detail. Any further violations will make it much, much, much harder to get unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 14:11, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Yamla how can I appeal to checkuser only they can unblock me but I didn't allwed to edit apart from my Talk page can you help me please Jaspal34 (talk) 14:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to make this any more clear. Read the policies and articles we've linked you to. --Yamla (talk) 14:17, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]