User talk:Jasonski

Hey Mods, someone is making multiple false accounts pretending to be me, and to avoid anymore conflict and problems please deactivate my account. Sorry for causing so many problems I started off as a Wiki-editor with big hopes but turned the wrong path, sorry for everything. Goodbye Wikipedia it was real. Jasonski (talk) 00:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jasonski, you are invited to the Teahouse!

 I am back.

Hi Jasonski! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to R. A. Dickey has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: R. A. Dickey was changed by Jasonski (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907284 on 2016-04-17T00:25:18+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. KH-1 (talk) 03:20, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Brett Cecil with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Donner60 (talk) 02:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=I'm very sorry for violating Wikipedia rules and the privileges granted to me. I will no longer add opinions to Wikipedia pages, as I have now understood my terrible mistake. I'm sorry, I would love a second chance, I will no longer violate nor harm wikipedia and its regulations. I'm sorry. Jasonski (talk) 02:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)}}

. Acroterion (talk) 02:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jasonski (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm very sorry for violating Wikipedia rules and the privileges granted to me. I will no longer add opinions to Wikipedia pages, as I have now understood my terrible mistake. I'm sorry, I would love a second chance, I will no longer violate nor harm wikipedia and its regulations. I'm sorry. I promise to never make the same mistakes ever again. Jasonski (talk) 02:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template {{reflist-talk}} and then save.
Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 12:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"{{Help me|Hey Moderators, I don't know how I am able to make changes on articles that need fixing because I am blocked from editing any public page. Please help, I would greatly appreciate a second chance to improve the community, if I disrupt wikipedia again or do something that violates the wikipedia policy, feel free to block me again, and I won't ask for another chance. ~~~~}}"

That's not a very convincing unblock request. If you indicate that you might disrupt Wikipedia, you won't be unblocked to begin with. There's an extensive set of directions on how you might prove good faith directly above. Please review them. Acroterion (talk) 17:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

re

Sir, the point I was trying to make by saying that is that I won't make the same mistake because I really don't want to be blocked, and I'm very keen on helping any pages that need assistance. I promise I won't make another disruptive edit again, you have my word. I honestly think I've turned the corner, and I promise to help this wonderful site. Jasonski (talk) 18:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Am I permanently blocked? Jasonski (talk) 01:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A guy saved by Jesus I promise this Jasonski 2 isn't me, help I'm being framed I have no idea who he is Jasonski (talk) 00:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{Help me|Hey Moderators, I am deeply sorry for my previous actions, and I am not associated with any of the Jasonski accounts as I have no idea who control or operate them, I can swear that I am not using those accounts. However, back to my request I really regret my actions as I have noticed the immense privilege I used to have when I could edit and fix articles. I abused my privileges and I am sincerely sorry for doing this. Wikipedia is a community that builds around the dedication of editors who contribute to articles, and previously I did not do so, however I have changed and will no longer revert to my previous actions, I swear. I know I will probably never get a second chance or a chance at helping the Wikipedia community grow, I deeply am regretful of my actions and I am truly sorry for them. I did not understand the severity and I treated this community inappropriately, and I am once again very sorry. If you grant me with another chance I can promise and swear that I will never vandalize or misuse my privileges again, and only use them to add to this wonderful website. Thank you for regulating this website so efficiently and thank you for taking your time to read this, if your ban decision is final, I just want to say thank you for dealing with me and showing me the true privilege of an editor that has been revealed to me during this ban. I am sorry for being a disruption, all the best. Jasonski (talk) 04:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC) ~~~~ }}[reply]

August 2016

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]