User talk:Jasonhalogen

Welcome!

Hello, Jasonhalogen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Luxury live at paradise.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Luxury live at paradise.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Luxury

Adding templates indicating that an article has problems/issues is perfectly valid and is part of the editing process. Once the issues have been addressed, feel free to remove the templates -- but not before! Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Whoa up there! Some of those, while a bit drastic, were legitimate edits endeavoring to diminish the promotional content of that article! You're biting the noob here! --Orange Mike | Talk 18:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the warnings. I didn't realize you had created the page because I was using Huggle. (Which will also tell you why I kept reverting you.) Also, if you leave an edit summary for all your edits (and especially ones that add or remove large amount of content), it will help cut down on accidental reversion like myself and a few other users did. I am really sorry about that and please do not be turned off by this experience. Sorry about that and happy editing! Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 18:38, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate and accept the apology. I'm sorry, in turn, that the page isn't perfect. It is, as you noted, my first attempt at anything like this. Jasonhalogen (talk) 19:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The Luxury, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Luxury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Luxury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Orange Mike | Talk 15:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Luxury

Hello Jasonhalogen, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created on May 12 2008, The Luxury, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:64.134.66.182 (page has mainspace links, and more than 49 edits). This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:64.134.66.182. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 64.134.66.182 (talk · contribs) 00:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The Luxury

Hello, Jasonhalogen,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The Luxury should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Luxury .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 10:02, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]