User talk:Jarvishunt

Silverman article

hi there. I added a few references to the Barry Silverman article, but that seemed to contradict what you had originally written (in the notable cases section). Wasn't sure if I'm misreading things, so I added a note on the talk page and changed some wording. Just wanted to let you know. PS: Good job with all the refs :) --Bfigura ^(talk) 02:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Jarvishunt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Barry_G._Silverman. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bfigura ^(talk) 02:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barry Goode

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Barry Goode, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Barry Goode

I have nominated Barry Goode, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Goode. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Nomoskedasticity (talk) 16:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Enrique Moreno

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Enrique Moreno, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Mendte

After reading about the allegations I've put this on my watchlist and apprasied WP:TVS of the situation, so we'll keep a close eye on it for now. I get the feeling this is something that sockpuppets and vandals lick their lips about and we need to keep things NPOV as much as we can. Nate • (chatter) 23:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Allen Snyder

I have created the dab page at Allen Snyder. When you do the move it automatically adds the redirect to the new location, but you then just need to overwrite the redirect by editing the page. It is regarded as good manners to fix any broken links that occur as a result of creating the dab page i.e. those pages that previously correctly linked the football coach. I have fixed the links in the templates. Tassedethe (talk) 16:33, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much Tassedethe! You are the best. I appreciate your quick help on the dab. I'll separately be monitoring the football coach's page for vandalism in the meantime, but your dab really helps clean up what had been a somewhat confusing redirect. Thanks again!

judicial appointment controversies by president articles

I like these very much. Thanks for creating more of them, pushing further back into history. So much of Wikipedia is focused on only the most recent of events, yet this is a topic that obviously should be covered all the way back to George Washington. You are doing some fine work on judge articles, something I have worked on (though not so much recently). I created the Judicial appointment history for United States federal courts article to help understand some of the politics behind the process, and the new controversy articles are helping to do the same. Keep up the good work. Cheers, NoSeptember 16:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Judith Whittaker

Recently you added Judith Whittaker's nomination to the Ronald Reagan judicial appointment controversies article, but I can find no proof that she was ever actually nominated. Should people considered but never actually nominated be included in these judicial appointments articles? If they should, both Chris Cox and Peter Keisler need to be specially mentioned in the George W. Bush judicial appointment controversies article. Both were originally court of appeals choices in the spring of 2001 - Chris Cox for the Ninth Circuit and Peter Keisler for the Fourth Circuit. Both withdrew themselves from consideration when their homestate Democratic senators objected [1][2]. BoBo (talk) 04:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. I like your idea of adding commentary about nominees considered but ultimately not nominated at the end of the judicial appointments controversy articles. I must add that I have been very impressed with your articles and level of research. Good luck in the future. BoBo (talk) 14:35, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ben C. Toledano

I found your addition of the situation concerning a possible nomination of Ben C. Toledano to the Fifth Circuit in the Ronald Reagan judicial appointment controversies article very interesting. Do you have a reference for it? BoBo (talk) 04:01, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that resurrecting the Toledano article would be a good thing. I also agree that it needs to be rewritten. The sections on his political campaigns are uncessarily long and detailed. They need to be made more concise and to the point. Do you think the need for a resurrection needs to be posted somewhere, like on deletion review? BoBo (talk) 15:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Barack Obama Supreme Court candidates article

Although I don't know how you may feel on the subject, someone is trying to have the Barack Obama Supreme Court candidates article deleted. I am very opposed to such a deletion. I think the topic is totally valid on Wikipedia. You may wish to comment on the deletion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Barack_Obama_Supreme_Court_candidates. BoBo (talk) 01:41, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gerald Ford Supreme Court candidates

On 12 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gerald Ford Supreme Court candidates, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 05:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jodine Costanzo

Do you plan on making a page for Jodine Costanzo because at present her name shows up as a red link and your changes will most likely be reverted unless you are making a page for this reporter. Please let me know. - NeutralHomer • Talk • December 17, 2008 @ 00:27

Excellent! Thanks for letting me know. Please don't forget any references. :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • December 17, 2008 @ 00:35

AfD

I've just nominated John P. McCormick for deletion.Steve Dufour (talk) 02:26, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John P. McCormick

On 21 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John P. McCormick, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:11, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed links from Presidential judicial appointments articles

I appreciate your fixing the links in these articles to the names they are under in Wikipedia. The names on the lists are from the Federal Judicial Center website, so when you make these fixes, please also make a redirect from the red link to the correct article name. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! bd2412 T 02:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed new policy

As a recent contributor to Deaths in 2009, you may be able to help decide on a proposed new policy. It is proposed that:

A month should be deleted from the "Deaths in [CURRENT YEAR]" page ONE WEEK after the month ends.

Please opine at Talk:Deaths_in_2009#Proposed new policy. Don't just say

Support.

or

Oppose.

Also state your reasons and participate in the discussion. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn Johnsen - good work

I appreciate your expansion of the Dawn Johnsen stub. It was on my to-do list but it didn't look like I'd get around to it anytime soon.

I added a few wikilinks. Next on my agenda would be making the footnotes look nicer by using the citation templates, now that you've done the hard part! JamesMLane t c 21:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dwight D. Eisenhower Supreme Court candidates

Would you be interested in collaborating on this soon-to-be initiated article (or in initiating it)? I have proposed this to be the next collaboration for Wikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judges. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Litchfield and Madison

Thanks for helping to fill in gaps in our coverage of former Class I railroads. You may find [3] useful if you wish to expand the article, especially the history on pp. 169-170; there's also a bit more in the Chicago, Peoria and St. Louis Railroad article. [4] (July 1904) shows no passenger equipment. [5] (June 1905), however, shows $8 in passenger revenue for the year, and [6] (June 1906) shows $60, so maybe it operated mixed trains. [7] (January 1905) and [8] (January 1909) do show one daily passenger train. --NE2 12:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mike Penner

On December 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mike Penner, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

⇌ Jake Wartenberg 16:08, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago news personality birthdates

Just wondering, where are you getting those birthdates from? Zagalejo^^^ 23:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, OK. Thanks for adding those sources! Zagalejo^^^ 00:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Judges appointed by Obama article.

Sorry for reversing your edits. We must have been editting simultaneously, and I hit the wrong button, deleting your edits and mine, too. I had to go back and re-add mine. TheUnknown285 (talk) 21:03, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

Could you please provide a reference for the information you added to Deanell Reece Tacha? It needs to be included for verification. Thanks! --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Clinton judicial appointments

Just to let you know, I started a talk page thread on an article you created suggesting possibly renaming the article. See Talk:Bill Clinton judicial appointment controversies Kansan (talk) 15:16, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article I judicial appointees.

Actually, we do include Article I judges, see List of federal judges appointed by George W. Bush#Specialty courts. I was not aware that Obama had appointed any. Cheers! bd2412 T 03:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chen

Hi as your comment was uncited I have move it to talkpage for citing and replacing, thanks - see [Talk:Edward_M._Chen#cloture.3F - Off2riorob (talk) 21:19, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi , the same goes for your addition at Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies - note - if its worth adding its worth citing, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 21:21, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gregg Costa

The article Gregg Costa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has not been confirmed. With current politically climate, he might never be confirmed or could take a long time. With sports players, they have to play a game in major professional game first, same hold here. Re-add page when he is confirmed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 01:59, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Jarvishunt! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Nomination of Charles Bernard Day for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Bernard Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Bernard Day until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lincolnite (talk) 01:12, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mike Lee

Michael Charles Green (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mike Lee

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note in regards to Curiel and Shelby

I made a note in each article, that each Judge was confirmed on the "legislative" day of the 21st, which would be the official date of their confirmation, even though the vote took place on the 22nd. I just slipped it into each article in parentheses. It might be better to do it as a note. Safiel (talk) 06:10, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carol Moseley Braun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Fitzgerald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999 Major League Umpires Association mass resignation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bob Davidson and Larry McCoy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Way back in 2009...

...You added this material to the Robert Palmer biography. I removed it today because the references do not appear to be valid. Note that your additions do not have URLs. While trying to validate the references through online searches, I got stuff written in fan blogs and attributed to newspapers, but the newspapers themselves do not show that these articles were ever written. Binksternet (talk) 15:50, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Skaneateles Short Line Railroad

Hi! You created Skaneateles Short Line Railroad. I've found a Trains article from 1971 and will hopefully be expanding the article a little over the next few days. Do you recall which edition of Lewis' shortline guides you used? I have the 1986 and 1991 Kalmbach editions but I don't have any of the older ones under the Baggage Car imprint. Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 01:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard W. Roberts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ed Whelan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Your addition to Cassandra Butts has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You copied several sentences directly from the New York Times article. All material has to be properly paraphrased. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 18:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jarvishunt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jarvishunt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Raymar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Raymar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Raymar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 20:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jarvishunt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Mumphrey

I saw you did this edit[9] to his article. The source[10] doesn't say that is the same Mumphrey as the baseball player. Therefore I removed it. I know Mumphrey was born in Texas but it is WP:SYNTH to combine two sources to say something neither one says....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:51, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yadav Nathwani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yadav Nathwani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yadav Nathwani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nightfury 08:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source needed for a death

A reference is needed for the death of Marvin Zonis. The edits have been reverted, because this definitely needs proof. KittenKlub (talk) 07:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deaths in 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Knox College. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon - April 22nd - 2PM EST

You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd!

Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for:

2022 Earth Day Edit-a-thon 2pm - 4pm EST (April 22nd) online via Zoom and in person

This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/

-- Environment of New York City Task Force - Wil540 art (talk) 21:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Jim Ryan (politician)

On 16 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Ryan (politician), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 19:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Katie McCall

The article Katie McCall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the general notability guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chris Hernandez

The article Chris Hernandez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rolland Hein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheaton College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stacia Dubin

The article Stacia Dubin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG: Only sources I could find were Jewish Chronicle source already in the article, a piece about how she and her husband bought a house in 2010, and a brief mention in an article about a stadium crush that happened in 1993. Couldn't find any sources in TWL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — SamX [talk · contribs · he/him] 23:38, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of K. Gary Sebelius for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K. Gary Sebelius is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Gary Sebelius until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Snickers2686 (talk) 22:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2024

Hi. When adding a name to the list (as you did for Jack Higgins), please also cite a source. Thanks. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 07:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jodine Costanzo

The article Jodine Costanzo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the WP:GNG. No significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]