User talk:JarvisORV

This is JarvisORV's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nano (Cryptocurrency) (May 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by WikiDan61 was: undefined

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:19, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback WikiDan61 The primary sources from the Nano team documents have been removed and several independent sources from WSJ, Fortune, TechCrunch have been added and will resubmit shortly. All of the academic papers reference Nano substantively except for 3. which talks substantively about block lattice architecture and mentions that this is utilised by the Nano protocol.

Hello, JarvisORV! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:19, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nano (cryptocurrency) (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MrClog was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All the coverage by independent reliable sources seems to be about the hack (where the nano is more of a trivial mention). Note that the Forbes article is made by a "Contributor" (not "Staff") and is therefore considered unreliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nano (cryptocurrency) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nano (cryptocurrency), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MrClog (talk) 07:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nano (cryptocurrency)

Hello, JarvisORV,

Thank you for creating Nano (cryptocurrency).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The design section's direct comparisons to Bitcoin are likely undue and come off as promotional, as is some of the minutiae in the history section.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 08:18, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Rosguill, we will have a look and address those issues. JarvisORV (talk) 09:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nano (cryptocurrency)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nano (cryptocurrency) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2001:569:BF37:5300:E967:D343:A08:C58A (talk) 07:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]