User talk:Jaro.p~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello Jaro.p~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

I am always pleased to see anyone contributing to musical articles - your article on Samuel Pokrass was where I first came across your work here. Is English your first language? If not, what is your first language? I ask because some of the sentences in that article do seem a little uncertain, almost as if they have been mechanically translated from another language, which is why I took the liberty of placing a cleanup tag on the page - is there anything I can do to help? --RobertG ♬ talk 09:50, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

March of the Soviet tankmen

I notice you've added links to this ogg file to some tank articles. There's very little information in the media link, and it would be better to put that into a small stub article with a bit of info about the march, and link to the article from the "See also" section of the tank articles.

Is this the same as the Soviet tankmen song? —Michael Z. 2005-12-6 16:15 Z

Katyn - 11,000

Could you explain your edit?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 14:22, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Since our article is referenced, I'd recommend raising the number issue on the talk page(s) of respective wikipedia's articles and seeing who can source their numbers.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 15:22, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid I cannot understand the second question you asked. The 400,000 numbers is wrong - it likely refers to the German POVs (Poles captured by the Germans). Soviet POVs (Poles captured by the Soviets) numbered 250,000 (according to our reference).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:54, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Maslowsneeds.png

Why did you upload a new image over Image:Maslowsneeds.png? I think the first image is suprior, but that is just my opinion. Please upload your file as a seperate verision so that users can pick between them.--Bkwillwm 20:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry offtopic

Не котите ещё против Каганера на выборах арбитров русской Вики проголосовать? 2 голосов не хватает. 195.54.216.10 08:22, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture at Taylor series

Hi. Thank you for the picture you added. One request. Would you mind making the curves in the picture thicker, so that the picture does not appear so blurry? Same for the axes, and a bit larger fonts won't hurt either. Sorry to bug you, your work is appreciated, but if we can make it look nicer it will be even better. Thanks, you can reply here if you have comments. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день

Извините, что отвлекаю, не проголосуете за достойного кандидата в админы русской Википедии [1]. 195.54.216.10 13:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день

Простите за беспокойство, это опять я :-)

Не забудьте проголосовать на выборах в арбитры в русской Википедии. Лучше голосовать ближе к концу (конец 27 ноября). Обратите внимание, что Solon'а топит известная группа личностей. 195.54.216.10 21:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

golosovanija ne nashol da ja redko stal byvat tut--Jaro.p 12:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Эх, обидно, ну ничего, в следующий раз буду давать точные ссылки. А вот не проголосуете Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homophobic propaganda. Serebr 21:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Bargeev.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bargeev.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

Please note that article Srbosjek is being considered for deletion (again). I think you might want to take a look. Terse (talk) 11:23, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:На большой Европейской дороге, 1940.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:На большой Европейской дороге, 1940.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:37, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The 22 June song

The article The 22 June song has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like copyright violation. Works from non-US country in 1940s and not published simultaneously would normally be in copyright unless they can be demonstrated to not be so.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:02, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jaro.p. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jaro.p~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

14:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The 22 June song for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The 22 June song is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 22 June song until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:50, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]