User talk:Jaridgway/sandbox
Evaluations
[edit]- Points: 27/40
- Grade: 67.5%
Spelling/Grammar
[edit]Nearly Meets Standard The original spelling "principal" is correct in this context, and not "principle". I also would not have removed "run by", as that specifically indicates that the identified organization oversees the public transit system...this is merely suggestion and please feel free to tell my why you disagree! These were the only issues in this category and were minor but, considering the very limited amount of edited content, they weigh more heavily.
Language
[edit]Meets Standard
Organization
[edit]Nearly Meets Standard Due to the limited amount of content edited, there was no ability to identify organization, apart from sentence structure and presentation.
Coding
[edit]Exceeds Standard
Validity
[edit]Meets Standard There is no invalid information, but there also appears to be no original content.
Completion
[edit]"Standard?" I cannot find any original or citations that were added by you. The most recently added citation was in 2017. Please inform me if I am missing somewhere else that you documented sources. It also seems that less than an adequate amount of work was done, as only a few minor grammar changes were made. I encourage you to consider this before submitting a final draft so you can get a good grade from the instructor!
Relevance
[edit]Exceeds Standard No new information was added, so technically no irrelevant information is present in your edit.
Sources
[edit]"Standard?" No sources seem to have been added by you.
Citations
[edit]"Standard?" No sources seem to have been added by you.
References
[edit]"Standard?" No sources seem to have been added by you.
Ctardif5 (talk) 07:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Evaluations
[edit]Evaluations
[edit]1/31/2018 Evaluation by Nikki_sato
[edit]- Points: 39/40
- Grade: 97.5%
Spelling/Grammar
[edit]Meets Standard Nice choice of words, and it flows very well for me,
Language
[edit]Meets Standard
Organization
[edit]Meets Standard Liked how you arranged the paragraphs or transportation in the order, like buses and trams/rails, transporation that tourists would use, and locals.
Coding
[edit]Meets Standard
Validity
[edit]Meets Standard I'm curious on where you found that the information about car without permits are allowed to enter certain hours? do you have sources
Completion
[edit]"Meets Standard"
Relevance
[edit]Meets Standard
Sources
[edit]"Nearly Meets Standard" Broad but specific choices and variety of sources!
Citations
[edit]"Meets Standard" Looks like there are some citations missing but you clearly pointed it out that you are going to add them example: Citation needed
References
[edit]"Meets Standard"
Nikki_sato (talk) 08:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Evaluations
[edit]- Points: 39/40
- Grade: 97.5%
Spelling/Grammar
[edit]Meets Standard Some improvements to the sentence structure and grammar used would be the primary focus for improvement. Good overall.
Language
[edit]Meets Standard
Organization
[edit]Nearly Meets Standard Structure would be improved if each bullet point was instead the name of the museum. It is not incorrect as it is, but in your efforts to improve the page and not have the "Museum" only be a list, the bullet points should be replaced with a better way to identify the subject of each section you have added.
Coding
[edit]Exceeds Standard
Validity
[edit]Meets Standard
Completion
[edit]"Nearly Meets Standard" Although you have included the required number of sources, I would encourage you to add a bit more content, if you can find some about the other museums. This will increase the likelihood that the grader will treat you well in this section.
Relevance
[edit]Exceeds Standard The information that was added is very relevant and seemingly helpful to the page.
Sources
[edit]"Meets Standard" Most of the sources are good quality, but it does not appear that there are any academic sources. I also did not find any sources from the PSU library web page, as my topic was also related to art and nothing relevant could be found there.
Citations
[edit]"Meets Standard" The citations appear to be designed appropriately, but you did not use source "1" as a citation in the text, just so you are aware.
References
[edit]"Meets Standard"
Ctardif5 (talk) 05:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Evaluation By Nikki_sato
[edit]2/28/2018 Evaluation by Nikki_sato
[edit]- Points: 39/40
- Grade: 97.5%
Spelling/Grammar
[edit]Meets Standard Good job overall!
Language
[edit]Meets Standard
Organization
[edit]Nearly Meets Standard the Museum list could be improved, by sectioning it off under a header or leading to another wikipedia site with more content on that specific museum?
Coding
[edit]Exceeds Standard Awesome job!
Validity
[edit]Meets Standard
Completion
[edit]"Nearly Meets Standard" You've completed the minimum 10 citations sources, I'm a little confused on the list of museums, maybe put it under a header?
Relevance
[edit]Exceeds Standard The information that was added is very relevant and seemingly helpful to the page.
Sources
[edit]"Meets Standard" Loved that you added a picture for reference of a painting within one of the museusm.
Citations
[edit]"Meets Standard" Citations 6 and 7, a little confused on that
References
[edit]"Meets Standard"
Awesome job! keep it we're almost done Nikki_sato (talk) 11:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)