User talk:Jaredeugene-carrasco
|
Chronicles of Klikia
[edit]Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Re your message: When I deleted the article, there was no meaningful content within the article. Wikipedia is not a place for you to publish excerpts from your book. Perhaps once you get the book published and if it becomes notable, somebody else will write an article about it on Wikipedia. However, until that time, you should not create an article about it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:36, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Chronicles of Klikia
[edit]A tag has been placed on Chronicles of Klikia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JD554 (talk) 08:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
[edit]Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Chronicles of Klikia, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 08:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Please understand, your article will not meet WP's criteria for nobility because it is about a book that isn't even out yet, and may not meet the criteria itself. Continuing to introduce such materia will only get you banned. If you are truely the author of said book, then you should finish it, publish it, and wait for it to aquire fame before it is featured here. Please read up on WP guidelines before you submit any more articles. Daedalus (talk) 20:17, 4 March 2008 (UTC)