User talk:JaredEvansKU

Please let me know if you need any help with editing Wikipedia. You can put queries to me on my Talk page or on your own Talk page. Have fun! Hoopes (talk) 21:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at your draft article on Pseudoscience in Social Media and I think it's really good. I hope that the editors at Wikipedia will agree that it's a valuable topic. I think you've done a really nice job with it. The only question that I think might arise is whether this topic should be a subheading within the general pseudoscience article, but I think that you've demonstrated it is a robust topic with enough relevant content that it really should be able to stand on its own. (The article on pseudoscience is already quite large.) For example, your new article could be linked from the "See also" article on that page. You can refer Wikipedia editors to either this talk page or to mine if they would benefit from some further discussion. I think it will be really essential to make it clear what is meant by social media, citing specific examples. It is hard to anticipate where definitions of social media will go, but I think the articles will evolve as it does. Hoopes (talk) 21:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pseudoscience in Social Media (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pseudoscience in Social Media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pseudoscience in Social Media, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 03:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JaredEvansKU! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 03:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see that your draft article has been declined. I think you made a really good effort at it and hope that you will return to see whether it can be resubmitted. Let me know if you have any specific questions about my edits. I think the main issue is providing citations of reliable source material to make it clear that the article doesn't violate WP:OR. This can be tricky, but it requires identifying publications that have already made the points that you want to emphasize. I know this may sound odd, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that seeks to summarize information that is already available in other sources, not to present new information. Hoopes (talk) 20:52, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It does read like an essay. Take a look at your "lead", the first paragraph, and WP:LEAD - the first sentence needs to mention the subject of the article. This is an encyclopedia and it needs formal language, and every source must discuss the topic. "Still, there are many ways" is too informal and essay-like. I have asked at our fringe theories notice board - WP:FTN to see if anyone can help you. I'm facing chemotherapy next week and just don't have the time. I added a new source at FTN. Doug Weller talk 16:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pseudoscience on social media

Hello, JaredEvansKU. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pseudoscience on social media, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:03, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pseudoscience on social media

Hello, JaredEvansKU. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pseudoscience on social media".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]