User talk:Janwillembreure

Speedy deletion nomination of Are All Men Pedophiles?

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Are All Men Pedophiles? requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. The Anome (talk) 12:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Are All Men Pedophiles?

Hello, Janwillembreure, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Are All Men Pedophiles? whether the article Are All Men Pedophiles? should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Are All Men Pedophiles?, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:53, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello Janwillembreure. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Are All Men Pedophiles?, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. NtheP (talk) 15:08, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information Nthep and The Anome. The description of the film was on Sideways Film UK, that is what i mainly used to describe to film. I hope that is objective enough.Janwillembreure (talk) 15:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Corrupting article

Could you please explain this edit? For your information I have reverted back to the way it was. __meco (talk) 06:45, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at the presskit on www.areallmenpedophiles.com or the http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2072045/ to see the orginal poster. Please return the poster to the orginal state.

There's never been another image illustrating this article. __meco (talk) 09:56, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's because the articles writers grab the first image they can find, but the first image of the film is only specified for the opening page of the website

Does it matter? __meco (talk) 11:19, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it does, i try to hold wikipedia to some some standards and the current image is small, sloppy and pixelated.

Then please remember that a non-free image is supposed to have its quality reduced compared to its original. This could mean both reducing the resolution and cropping the image. __meco (talk) 20:33, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please return the poster to it's orginal state

I'm sorry. You seem not to be reading my responses to you. __meco (talk) 07:58, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously!! Let me explain in techinical terms what the difference is between , your version of the poster has different dimension, is longer than orginal poster because it contains the "The Most Controversial...." which is not on the original poster! you realize you are talking to the orginal owner of all content of the documentary! How would you feel if someone misrepresented your work!

Proposed deletion of Do Women Have A Higher Sex Drive?

The article Do Women Have A Higher Sex Drive? has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no third party sources for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Do Women Have A Higher Sex Drive? for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Do Women Have A Higher Sex Drive? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Do Women Have A Higher Sex Drive? until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:45, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Studio FOW for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Studio FOW is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studio FOW until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]