Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
The material you persist on deleting from Prince William, Duke of Cambridge, is reliably sourced. Given that, plus the absence of any reason for why you're removing it, it's very hard to understand your objection or concern or whatever is motivating you. Can you explain what the problem is? --ĦMIESIANIACAL02:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Really, are you really demanding a reason? Are you an auditor on Wikipedia? You do know you are the only person concerned with why a Canadian painter's flagrant self-promotion on a foreign royal's Wikipedia page was removed?
Listen I can find many reliably sourced item that have a vague association with Prince William and his bride, but myself and the whole rest of the world KNOW, that that Canadian artist, Charles Patcher, printing out a picture, of people he doesn't know, and then painting on it has NOTHING to do with these two young adults getting married. His personal and professional work needs to stay on his page.
My husband and I could write a long beautiful story that touches upon, um, let's go ahead and say Shawn Carter and Beyonce Knowles, but would that story, even if everyone who reads it loves it, REALLY belong on either of their Wikipedia pages???
Seriously, if the validity of Wikipedia is ever to be proven, this kind of lame self-promoting, internet name dropping has to stop.--Janedoewalks (talk) 04:27, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
--Janedoewalks (talk) 04:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
