Jump to content

User talk:Jane of all trades

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion of Michael "Mike" Spiegel

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Michael "Mike" Spiegel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Unschool (talk) 07:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have withdrawn my CSD nomination, but think an AfD might be appropriate. I am leaving it to others to decide. Unschool (talk) 07:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (Jane of all trades) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Unschool (talk) 08:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice

[edit]

Jane, I want you to read Wikipedia:Lead section as soon as possible, preferably, before you continue editing Michael "Mike" Spiegel. A big part of the reason that I first tagged this article for deletion is that the opening sentence violates everything that WP:LEAD stands for. I mean, who is this guy? I can read the whole article and I'm still not totally sure.

I can see that you're acting in good faith here, but this article is still at risk for deletion. That would mean that your work—and I can see that it is considerable—would be totally wasted. So read WP:LEAD and WP:NOTE, and I think you'll be off to a much better start. Happy editing! Unschool (talk) 08:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Spiegel for deletion

[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Michael Spiegel, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Spiegel until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Cirt (talk) 10:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]