User talk:Jamzze

Welcome!

Hi Jamzze! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — MarkH₂₁^talk 06:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Advice about Draft:Methods (research)

I see that you created Draft:Methods (research) and submitted it at WP:AFC. That article is only two paragraphs! Have you noticed that there is already a suitable redirect, Research methods, that points to Research § Research methods? Why don't you say what you think needs to be said about the topic there? I think you should request deletion of Draft:Methods (research) and edit Research § Research methods instead. Biogeographist (talk) 01:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Grace Saif has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Grace Saif. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Saif (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

Several sources are fan-created blogs or wikis and are not considered reliable sources on WP; these need to be replaced with reliable sources to establish notability. Also, she should be referred to as "Saif" throughout the draft, not "Grace".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grace Saif and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Grace Saif, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jamzze! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 10:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe theories template

Hello Jamzze and thank you for your contributions. The new template {{Fringe Theory}} is being discussed at WP:FTN § Fringe Theory template where your input is also welcome. Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 22:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fringe Theory

Template:Fringe Theory has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. jps (talk) 22:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Saif has been accepted

Grace Saif, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article duplicated by draft

Hi Jamzze! I'm leaving you this quick note to let you know that I've tagged your draft article Draft:Methods (research) with a request for speedy deletion since it's a duplicate of Research methods. If you're interested, please feel free to work on improving the content of Research methods, which might benefit from some of the content and/or citations in your draft article! warmly, ezlev. talk 08:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of research methods

Hello, Jamzze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of research methods, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Acute radiation syndrome and pollution

Regarding the article Acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and the addition of the pollution macro:

Isn't ARS more of a health-thing than an environment thing? Or more specifically, ARS is a syndrome that can be medically diagnosed (etymologically)? In particular, ARS can appear without any pollution to an environment, for example from improper use of radiological sources, as with the Goiânia accident, Therac-25 and the demon core. (Although, the Goiânia accident also caused environmental pollution.) · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 16:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I would say it is both. The navbox in question had this section already a part of it before I created the sidebar - so good to bring this up. You're right though in terms of this happening for other reasons other than nuclear/ radioactive pollution so have moved the sidebar in the article to a more apt place.

The syndrome can be caused by this type of pollution, so I think it still works on the page, but moved so it is not the immediate thing the reader sees/ confuses them. Jamzze (talk) 16:56, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Thank you :) The sidebar maybe helps for navigating · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 16:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A question

Hi, Would you mind explaining a little bit on removing the "by region" list in the Socialism sidebar? I think that list is not an eyesore there.--ときさきくるみ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 07:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I moved this section to a new "list" part so that it is automatically created when tagged for with the new category that I created. There is a bit of discrepancy between the sidebar infobox and the bottom-page nav box, so just trying to make what can automatically be generated present as much as possible.

Additionally, there are some other lists that would work well for the infobox, but the infobox would get rather long with them, so freeing up some room allows for it to be expanded a bit :D Jamzze (talk) 07:58, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's understandable~.--ときさきくるみ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 08:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources for medical content

Hello, Jamzze. Please read WP:MEDRS before continuing your efforts to update Multiple sclerosis. It's a difficult subject, because you can find someone claiming anything you want if you look far enough, which means it's better to be fairly strict with sources. PMID 32761325, for example, probably isn't the best source, because the publisher classified it as an Editorial opinion piece, which usually means that it wasn't peer-reviewed.

Good luck, WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments, that source though was not something I cited. I placed a subheading for biotin to help readers better identify it, but have not produced any writing or citations for it - so I am not sure how that example is applicable to me.

Please do look at the full edit history as, although I may have edited parts with sourcing issues, I have not been the person to add them in.

I will, though, review the sources I have added and edit were possible to ensure their relevance. Jamzze (talk) 05:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please also feel free to remove any questionable sources/content as you come across it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:29, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism

Hi Jamzze,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 02:10, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for this! I do love the breadth of work on wiki around anarchism so will try my best to keep some activities up within anarchism :D Jamzze (talk) 18:47, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Academic works about power (social and political) has been nominated for merging

Category:Academic works about power (social and political) has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Power (social and political) art has been nominated for merging

Category:Power (social and political) art has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Power (social and political) films has been nominated for merging

Category:Power (social and political) films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:08, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Power (social and political) books has been nominated for renaming

Category:Power (social and political) books has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David McCoy

Hello, Jamzze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David McCoy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anuj Kapilashrami

Hello, Jamzze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anuj Kapilashrami, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David McCoy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David McCoy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David McCoy (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please expand the body of this draft to indicate how the subject satisfies either academic notability or general notability. Do not simply add references. Please expand the body of the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David McCoy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David McCoy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jamzze

Thank you for creating List of bibliometrics software.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start I marked as reviewed

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anuj Kapilashrami

Hello, Jamzze. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anuj Kapilashrami".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:59, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glossary of sociology moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Glossary of sociology, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Along with lack of sources, the list is too fragmentary to be useful to readers or remain in mainspace (t · c) buidhe 05:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category "Library and information science journals"

Why did you make this category while we already have "Library science journals" with "Information science journals" as a subcat? --Randykitty (talk) 09:55, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because the journals that are placed within "library and information sciences journals" are interdisciplinary, whilst the journals in "library science" and "information science" are more specifcially focused on each subject respectively. Jamzze (talk) 09:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's ridiculous to have these three cats in parallel, you'll need to find a different solution for this. --Randykitty (talk) 10:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think these are three need categories that are not in parallel. "Library science journals" covers journals focused on librarianship, "information science journals" covers journals focused on information science, and "library and information journals" covers journals that are interdisciplinary in focus that do not fit in the previous categories alone. Jamzze (talk) 10:10, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David McCoy

Hello, Jamzze. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David McCoy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History of medicine

Thanks for making the article a bit less essay-like :) CactiStaccingCrane 13:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @CactiStaccingCrane, thanks for the comment. It still needs a fair amount of work, but hopefully it is sitting better as a wiki article. Jamzze (talk) 14:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Glossary of sociology

Hello, Jamzze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Glossary of sociology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of late modern physicians

Hello, Jamzze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of late modern physicians, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of early modern physicians

Hello, Jamzze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of early modern physicians, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:International Socialist Organisations has been nominated for renaming

Category:International Socialist Organisations has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Vipz (talk) 15:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Family concepts has been nominated for merging

Category:Family concepts has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 02:24, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History of public health

Hi Jamzee, Yesterday I posted my agreement in 'Public health' to your proposal for the creation of an article 'History of public health'. John Desmond (talk) 17:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Medical sociology concepts has been nominated for merging

Category:Medical sociology concepts has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deviance (sociology) concepts has been nominated for merging

Category:Deviance (sociology) concepts has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Industry (economics) concepts has been nominated for merging

Category:Industry (economics) concepts has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Political economic concepts has been nominated for merging

Category:Political economic concepts has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:33, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Celebrity concepts has been nominated for merging

Category:Celebrity concepts has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:16th-century socialists has been nominated for merging

Category:16th-century socialists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:18th-century socialists has been nominated for merging

Category:18th-century socialists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sociology websites has been nominated for splitting

Category:Sociology websites has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced articles February 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | February 2024 Backlog Drive

There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited.
Remember to tag your edit summary with [[WP:FEB24]], both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Edit Summary Search.
Interested in taking part? Sign up here.

You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Jamzze! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)15:38, 2 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

WikiProject Anarchism checking in

Hey there! I noticed you're on the WikiProject Anarchism members list, but you don't appear to have been very active in this subject area for some time. Just in case you're still interested, here's a little update:

In the past couple years, we have brought four articles to Featured status, including the ones on Nestor Makhno, La Salute è in voi, The May Pamphlet and "The Day Before the Revolution". We're likely to get even more to this status in the near future, so stay tuned to the front page for some of our best articles on the platform.
A number of our most vital articles have been reviewed and achieved Good Article status, including ones on Gaetano Bresci, Camilo Cienfuegos, Joseph Déjacque, Luigi Galleani, Paul Goodman, and the Kronstadt rebellion. As these "vital articles" are generally considered among the most important on the platform, we aim to get as many as possible to GA and FA status over the coming years.
We recently hit the first milestone for our stub-expansion project, getting the number of stubs down to under 1/5th of our total articles. This means that the vast majority of our articles are now relatively substantial, as we expand and add greater detail to the articles that lack sufficient information. We hope to narrow this number down even further, so more articles have the information they deserve.
We just started a cleanup drive, in which we are aiming to resolve the problematic parts of our articles, from finding citations for unsourced sections to fixing up formatting errors. In doing this, we intend to make sure our articles provide the best possible reading experience, without unsourced claims or ugly tags littering the page.

If you want to get more involved in the project, please feel free! We always need an extra pair of hands to help out with our ever-growing project. If you want to help out with one of the above efforts, go right ahead. If you want to keep more up to date with the project's activities, consider adding our noticeboard to your watchlist or adding your name to our mailing list. On the other hand, if you think you're time with the project is over, then consider removing your name from the members list, but we do hope you're still interested in our wee project.

All the best to you, whatever your future plans are. Regards, --Grnrchst (talk) 11:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Unreferenced articles November 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | November 2024 Backlog Drive

There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited.
Remember to tag your edit summary with #NOV24, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Hashtag Summary Search.
Interested in taking part? Sign up here.

You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]