User talk:Jamie Mackay

Untitled

Hello Jamie - thank you for your message on my talk page. Unfortunately I do a significant amount of cleanup work here at Wikipedia, so without knowing the IP address you edited under (which serves as your "account" when you're not logged in), or the exact article(s) you're referring to (I checked Monarchy but I have not done any work to that article), I am not able to provide an exact reasoning for the message or removal. I can say though that most of the time I remove a link, this is the message I leave: {{spam1}}. If you click on that you will see a standard message we editors leave when removing external links.

Though the emphasis of that message is on adding commercial links, it is considered spamming by Wikipedia standards to add links to the same website across multiple articles (see WP:SPAM), even if each link is custom tailored to the article. However, these rules do not apply if the website meets Wikipedia's standards for a reliable source (WP:RS), and the link serves as a citation (see WP:CITE) for content in the article. If your organization has information on the website that can in fact be a reference to content in some of our articles, by all means please add your link as a citation. Many articles are lacking such citation; providing citations would create a happy medium in which the Wikipedia article's content is properly referenced, and the reader has the opportunity to learn more about a topic by following the appropriate citation link to the full article/webpage your site offers.

If you have relevant links that cannot serve as a citation, you also have the option of placing the link on the applicable article's talk page and allowing other editors of the article to discuss it. Should a concensus be reached in favor of the link, it can be added to the article with the weight of the consensus to back it.

I hope this information is useful and also helps explain why your link may have been removed. If you have any further questions or concerns, please let me know. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 03:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for this, Dan. Actually I think it was related to Queen Elizabeth II and was probably to do with this feature :

Royal visit to NZ in 1953-54

Jamie Mackay 08:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I'm still unable to locate the exact article. If you find it, could you place a link here for me to follow? Thanks! --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 13:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't remember exactly either - but this page looks likely:

Monarchy in New Zealand

cheers Jamie Mackay 22:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have located my revert on that article. I reverted the edits primarily because links were added to the same site across multiple articles. I also noticed that these links were the only edits from that account (see Special:Contributions/203.97.248.131). That raises a major red flag with spam fighters such as myself - it makes it appear that the editor is here to promote their own website, which is a violation of guidelines. The 2 primary guidelines that cover this are WP:SPAM and WP:EL.

If you have any further concerns or questions, please feel free to reply here or on my talk page. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 23:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see now - sorry if I've been treading on toes! I've now added a talk request to two other external links I've recently added. I will also ask the historians working on our site to check the relevant Wikipedia articles and - if necessary - add to or correct them. Jamie Mackay 11:08, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all! NZHistory.net.nz looks like a wonderful site for information; I think it would be a great source for cited (WP:CITE) information that could be added to Wikipedia articles. If you or your historians would like further guidance on this, refer to WP:CITE or feel free to ask me on my talk page (User talk:AbsolutDan). --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 13:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

After leaving the above message I noticed no one has officially welcomed you to Wikipedia. Allow me to do so:

Welcome!

Hello, Jamie Mackay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 03:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: link in nuclear-free zone

Hi Jamie. When you find the time could you take another look at the link, Nuclear Free New Zealand (NZHistory) posted on Nuclear-free zone. I am having difficulty in loading the page. kind regards Mombas 09:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mombas - fixed now - had a stray fullstop at the end Jamie Mackay 18:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Jamie ;-) You should list those New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage links on your user page....would be a good sourse of info concerning NZ. Mombas 21:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, have done - wasn't sure if this was allowed. BTW do you know if we are allowed to add rss feeds from our sites? Jamie Mackay 19:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure about the rss feeds RSS but worthy of investigation. Check it out with User:Grutness he's been around for a while. Mombas 23:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Today in New Zealand History

Hello. The topic of your addition of the Today in New Zealand History links to the Days of the Year articles is being discussed on the Days of the Year talk page. I encourage you to join the discussion because that discussion will determine if the links are deemed appropriate. -- Mufka ^(user) ^(talk) ^(contribs) 00:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

link to NZHistory sinai campaign

Interested to see this site. A bit disappointed to see Powles's descriptions of Battle of Romani not included.--RoslynSKP (talk) 08:16, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lake Taupo Cycle Challenge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Latham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jamie Mackay. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]