User talk:Jamie Kugelmann

Welcome!

Hello, Jamie Kugelmann, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ewevenism, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ewevenism

A tag has been placed on Ewevenism, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Banksia aquilonia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Do not nominate Featured Articles for deletion. This is disrupting Wikipedia. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:04, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:09, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamie Kugelmann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i didnt know about sandbox. i know what i did was wrong sorry wont do it again Jamie Kugelmann (talk) 04:20, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Let's see - you tagged 2 key articles for deletion, and created a MASSIVE biography of living persons violation - quite likely one that provided the NAME of an underage person to the world, referring to them as a homosexual. I'm sorry, this has nothing to do with the sandbox, this has to do with the protection of not only this project, but also human beings from danger (✉→BWilkins←✎) 14:36, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamie Kugelmann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi BWilkins, As you may have seen, my account has been accessed from my school's IP Address. My friends got a hold of my laptop and have obviously destroyed my Wiki account. I have had nothing to do with any of this nonsense, so can you please clear my account as if nothing bad ever happened. I have secured my account. I don't want to see me being a bad person. I did nothing wrong. Can you please fix it up for me mate. thanks Jamie Kugelmann (talk) 6:10 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Assuming I believe your story about your friends, it seems that you've never had control of this account, so I'm not willing to take your word on it being secure now. But I don't believe your story about your friends in the first place, so that's beside the point. Danger ^{High voltage!} 11:37, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamie Kugelmann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Haha mate, you make no sense. You don't know anything that goes on in peoples' minds or my personal life/school life. I created the account a while ago on my own IP, which if you used your brain you could probably see the original sign-in IP address. It's dynamic meaning it changes after a power outage/modem reset. So anyway at school I am logged in and I get bullied at school, so some dicks take my laptop and play around with it. Has this been stopped? yes it has. So stop being so inconsiderate and lift the block. Jamie Kugelmann (talk) 3:00 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

In the absence of any positive contributions from this account, there is no reason to unblock. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:14, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.