User talk:Jamie Fann

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamie Fann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You can block me all you want but as long as the Fann Cup exists on Wikipedia, in mainspace or PapaDrom's page (he is also me) then I will never stop socking

Decline reason:

Unrepentant sock (procedural). -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:13, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamie Fann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a banned user so don't say I am decltype. Unblock me and we can discuss this on WP:ANNIE.

Decline reason:

Sock accounts are never unblocked- if an unblock ever happens, it will be your original account that will be unblocked. Of course, since using multiple accounts is inherently dishonest, most people who do it are never unblocked. The only thing I've seen work is for a user to show a willingness to respect the rules by respecting the block and not making accounts or editing at all for a significant period of time - a week for each account or ip you've used is a good rule of thumb. Then go back to the original account and address the reasons for your block, making a persuasive case that you understand the rules and that you have a solid plan for not breaking them- that your presence will make the encyclopedia better, with no disruption. You might be asked for a complete list of accounts and ips you have used. As far as I can see, so far, you've never made a useful edit to Wikipedia, but I didn't review all of your accounts, so I might have missed one- this will make it more difficult to make your case, so you should do it right- every sock you create makes it less likely that you will ever be welcome at Wikipedia. You've already learned that your current strategy is not effective in reaching your goals- you could make a new account every day for the rest of your life, and it would not result in the changes you desire being added to the encyclopedia. Perhaps a different strategy is called for - reading the rules carefully, understanding them, and following them even when you'd rather not is a strategy that has worked well for others. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:11, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.