User talk:Jamidwyer

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Jamidwyer, welcome to Wikipedia!

I noticed nobody had said hi yet... Hi!

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

You might like some of these links and tips:

some General guidance.
Tutorial and the Manual of Style.
Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
Use the Show preview button
Provide an Edit summary
Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
Take a look at Consensus of standards
Create a User page

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alf ^melmac 01:14, 6 November 2005 (UTC).[reply]

Photos

Thanks for contributing your photos. Very nice. -Willmcw 01:57, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, nice turtle picture. Since you have an account, you can go right ahead and make Mazunte, Oaxaca for yourself. Kappa 23:44, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Olmec & other photos

Hello. While you have contributed some nice photos at Olmec, not every photo contributed can be used. In particular, there are already two other colossal head photos in the article.

Moreover, neither photo you've inserted has any caption or any description and therefore adds, in my opinion, little to the article. What we really need are some detailed shots of Olmec artifacts: figurines in particular, or perhaps a shot of the "altars". Might you have something like this?? Madman 13:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since it seems you think there are too many Olmec heads for people to handle, I'll move them to a gallery. Jamidwyer 22:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Jamidwyer[reply]

Hey, I think that's a fabulous idea. I was thinking along the same lines. Please do. I would love to see it. BTW, do you have any photos of Olmec artifacts? The Olmec figurines article could certainly use some. Thanks again, Madman 22:44, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS Just looked at the Olmec page. I think I will be moving the gallery to the bottom of the article, where galleries are typically situated (like the one you added to in Sunflower). Moreover, the two existing colossal head photos were at the right places, I believe: one at the start of the article - you know, big splash, most recognizable feature of Olmec -- and the other in the alternative speculations, where it highlighted the rather "African" features of the head. That other photo you added is just baffling, in part because it's backlit and just comes across as a black column. I'm not sure that it belongs on the page. More later, Madman 22:54, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PPS Me again. I moved the "altar" photo you added to Olmec mythology over to La Venta, where there is already a decent-size discussion of this monument (aka Altar 4). However, I see that this image is listed for speedy deletion!! Could you change the label on the image to GFDL?? And do you have any more at home like this?? Madman 04:37, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PPPS: It would be best to load these photos in Wikipedia Commons, where they would be available to all Wikipedias, whatever language. I particularly think Altar 4 is worthly of inclusion elsewhere. Thanks, Madman 04:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try re-uploading the altar pic to Wikimedia Commons, but Wikimedia Commons surpassed my hassle threshhold last time I tried it.

It seems like you are very knowledgeable on Olmec culture, which is awesome, but it's possible your expertise has caused you to mistake your opinions for fact on some matters. For example, it doesn't matter if you think my picture is "baffling" or you think my citation is "good." It is a picture of an Olmec head. If I were looking for Olmec information, I would want to see as many Olmec heads as I could, and I think I'd be in the majority on that. And unscholarly as it is, I got the scraps of knowledge on that altar that I put up by Googling up the source I cited, which citation you removed. (I note that you don't cite any sources for your (much improved) altar factoids -- surely you weren't born with that knowledge (in which case your mother's diet should perhaps be cited for reasons of improving mankind)?)

The page you work so hard to keep at the status quo is a nice page. It doesn't have a bunch of rambling, redundant junk like other pages I've tried to fix, only to be beaten down by other people who have decided they own a page and they prefer it full of repetitive crap. But Wikipedia is meant for everyone to improve, not just the people who decide that some expertise gives them license to delete all changes that don't meet their arbitrary personal standards. This is a new trend (I blame the ability to subscribe to changes), and troubling. If it persists, Wikipedia will have all the errors and none of the sense of community that makes it worthwhile anyway.Jamidwyer 01:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)Jamidwyer[reply]

I'm glad you think Olmec is not full of rambling, redundant junk. And yes I do think that most folks would like to see as many colossal head photos as possible (which is why I think your idea of a gallery is most excellent). And you are correct that the altar section of La Venta is not referenced. I will try to fix that.

And thanks again for the Altar image. If you wish, I can upload it to Commons. Do you have any further ones taken in Villahermosa?? I think I saw one with you or a friend of yours on the flickr site. Madman 03:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, me again. I added your Monte Alban mask to the Mixtec article (in fact, it's the lead paragraph image). If you have any more artifacts shots, let me know. Thanks muchly, Madman 19:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. -Will Beback 05:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I see you've been removing some images from articles. I wonder why. If you feel there are too many images in an article, you might wish to transer some of the images to an image gallery at the Wikimedia Commons. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 14:18, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it looks like you've been removing your own nifty photos from articles. Is there some problem? Please explain, thanks. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 14:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sasquatch photos

If you were the person who took those photos of beck at sasquatch, you have good taste in music.

Thank you; you're awesome; Wikipedia is crushing my soul except for your kind, long-ago voice in the night. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jamidwyer (talk • contribs) 09:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Reptile Zoo

Hi! An article on this zoo would be most welcome, but it's been deleted three times for a lack of content. Please take the time to expand this before it gets deleted again. Thanks. - Lucky 6.9 07:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reptile Zoo

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Reptile Zoo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Reptile Zoo. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. NMChico24 07:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article deletions

Please read WP:Welcome and WP:CSD throughly. Pay special attention to WP:CSD#A1 (Articles line item 1) and WP:CSD#A7 (Articles line item 7) for further info on why your articles continue to be deleted. Thank you. --NMChico24 07:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can sign your posts on talk pages]] using four tildes (~~~~). An article needs content not just images. If you don't want to write content, put the images on a species page (for example, I added your images to talk:spitting cobra so that they could be added to the article if desired. jimfbleak 12:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:206royalanncherryclose.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:206royalanncherryclose.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 22:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:01sasquatchhail.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:01sasquatchhail.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 22:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:63europeanbeechleaves.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:63europeanbeechleaves.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 22:14, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:06sasquatch1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:06sasquatch1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 22:14, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Royalanncherrycontext2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Royalanncherrycontext2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 22:14, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:04sasquatchcardboardboxes.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:04sasquatchcardboardboxes.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 22:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stuffedbuffalo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Stuffedbuffalo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 22:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:08gorge2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:08gorge2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 22:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sumidero high point.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sumidero high point.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 22:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:09beckpuppet.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:09beckpuppet.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 22:20, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Laventaniche.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Laventaniche.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 09:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Laventaniche.jpg

Hi. When you uploaded Image:Laventaniche.jpg, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}} and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Wikipedia:Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 08:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:12beckpuppets.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:12beckpuppets.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:12beckpuppets.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gary King (talk) 00:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Mazunte turtle.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Mazunte turtle.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Mazunte turtle.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 22:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Santodomingocathedral.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Santodomingocathedral.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [2], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Santodomingocathedral.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 02:08, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Buffalobillvaquero.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Buffalobillvaquero.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:45, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Coorsgolden.jpg

File:Coorsgolden.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Coorsgoldencityscape.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Coorsgoldencityscape.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:20, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sumidero ecotourism reserve.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Sumidero ecotourism reserve.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:49, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Stevens.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stevens.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:22, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Danube bratislava.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danube bratislava.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Buffalostatue.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Buffalostatue.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --MGA73 (talk) 20:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danube bratislava.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danube bratislava.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:01, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gorgeatgeorge.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gorgeatgeorge.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.flickr.com/photos/74281168@N00/156190368/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:52, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Izquierdodreamer.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Izquierdodreamer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:43, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enarharkness3.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Enarharkness3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 11:00, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Starvcrk.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Starvcrk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 11:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Frenchlace3.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Frenchlace3.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 22:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sumidero.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sumidero.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Odo100k.jpg

The file File:Odo100k.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal photo, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mazuntegiantturtle.JPG

The file File:Mazuntegiantturtle.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only currently used on a maintenance page. Insufficient context to determine how it might be used in an encyclopedic way in the future.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 00:46, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mazunte turtle.JPG

The file File:Mazunte turtle.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Currently only used on a maintenance page. Insufficient context to determine how it might be used in an encyclopedic way in the future.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 00:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]