Jump to content

User talk:Jamez21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article Steven Barker has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. See WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Yttrium. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cosmic Latte (talk) 14:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Vsmith (talk) 14:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamez21 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

<redacted> is a killer it is oviously a valid aticle, before you say i am wrong, google IT and you will find out about this chilled killer, SO UNBLOCK ME.

Decline reason:

The fact that you can find something on google doesn't make it true, and doesn't make it notable. All information on Wikipedia, especially about living people, must be verifyable through reliable sources. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamez21 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

DO RESEARCH INTO BABY P, Real Name: <redacted by reviewing admin>, if you do not believe me look up births and deaths or even READ THE NEWSPAPERS YOU WILL FIND OUT ABOUT BABY P, WHAT ARE YOU ON MATE SAYING A CHILD KILLER SHOULD NOT BE NAMES AND SHAMED!!!!!!! YOU HAVE ARITICLES ABOUT The Yorkshire Ripper (Peter Sutcliffe) BUT SOMEONE WHO IS ALSO A KILLER CANNOT BE NAMED, ALSO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT IS WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO PUBLISH THE <redacted> STUFF.

Decline reason:

This is a disruptive request; see WP:GAB. If you repeat it, you will be blocked indefinitely and this page will be protected. —  Sandstein  09:54, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.