User talk:Jamesx12345/Archive 8

Hafaz Refrisa Maulana

Sorry Jamesx12345 From America And My Name Is Hafaz Refrisa Maulana In Indonesian This religion Islamic — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.79.62.220 (talk) 11:34, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove sock tags. Many thanks. James^x12345 11:37, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Sock tags James Now Or Call Me From Police

No legal threats. James^x12345 11:51, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for doing your work. I am a Yak so I am kind of stupid. --69.157.185.246 (talk) 19:35, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To atone for your sins, you could find five pieces of vandalism and revert them. It's actually remarkably fulfilling, and you might just get hooked :-) James^x12345 19:38, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will use my Hornpower to do so. Annoying Horn and Trouble Horn are my best assets (along with Third Horn). --69.157.185.246 (talk) 19:41, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Baptists

Hi James. I am aware that you will easily return the deleted page Primitive Baptist to its prior content. For several reasons I have edited and will continue to edit the Primitive Baptist link. In the future I hope to have more time to dedicate to contributing to the link. In its current form it is extremely historically inaccurate and offensive in some ways to the people who are at the present time named Primitive Baptist. The only thing more innacurate then the history outlined on the link is the way the so calle theology of Primitive Baptists is treated. NOWHERE ever have I encountered, regardless of the geopgraphy or chronology of these people referring to themselves as Calvinistic Baptist. I assume this is just an accidentental mislabe done entirely out of ignorance and miseducation. Primitive Baptists appeared long before the 1800s............... User:74.202.24.210, 18:12, 4 October 2013.

I'm not the best person to consult for this one - sorry. I just reverted your edits when you removed a lot of content, as it looked to me like vandalism. You might find at WikiProject Christianity somebody who can respond better. In the meantime, though, I don't see what is offensive about that page - it looks OK to me. Regards. James^x12345 18:19, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Friendly banter

Edit warring and canvassing

Your recent editing history at Tommy Merritt shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Azon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raeNrPq1K6s Video account of AZON Use Against the [[Burma Railway#

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:48, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But numerology based predictions are the limelight these days........cant neglect them..

But numerology based predictions are the limelight these days........cant neglect them.. it is more reliable than any other source...... it is based on knowledge.......and knowledge stands supreme...it should be given due respect at wiki..in its articles....... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.99.152.52 (talk) 18:50, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid they're just pipped by astrology, at the last count, for cricket at least. James^x12345 18:53, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ADV Films Info on Dr. Eggman

I edited the information as I wanted to clear things up that despite the title, the two part OVA, Eggman starred in was not a theatrical release, nor was it ever a theatrical release, as it was a direct to video release, which ADV Films made an error with, I was only trying to point that out.

OK. Please make sure you source any changes. Many thanks. James^x12345 19:01, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Coteau Holmes, LA edit by mouserat123

You recently removed my edit for the page involving my home village. I would like you to replace it being that it is very real. The village only has a hundred people or so and voting is done by punch card, so there are no citable sources for election or voting records. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mouserat123 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I very much doubt that is actually the case. Thank you anyway for alerting me to some unfixed vandalism. Regards. James^x12345 19:00, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

home town gudha gorji jhunjhunu rajasthan

i want to write more for my home town gudha gorji jhunjhunu rajasthan india so can i do this permision ? i want do more promotion my home town so please i want yr permition thanks ajit jakhar gudha gorji — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.219.7.234 (talk) 17:38, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anybody can edit, so you don't have to seek anybody's permission! See Wikipedia:Introduction for more. Regards. James^x12345 17:42, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uncle Acid Links

You stated why you removed my link on the page Uncle Acid and the Deadbeats. I was only trying to add another reference (NPR ALL Songs Considered article about the band)and I think it should be there. I don't understand the formatting to make it another reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.46.68 (talk) 20:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If that satisfies the criteria for a reliable source, you can cite it using <ref> </ref> tags (see WP:CITE.) However, that site looks more like a personal blog to me, so may not be suitable for use here. Regards. James^x12345 20:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help me editing Denikin

Don´t delete my contributions, only format it. Antisemite denial from crimes by Denikin, must to be removed from article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.207.187.233 (talk) 22:09, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually pretty straightforward - see WP:CITE for how to use the syntax. Just make sure you remain neutral, and you'll be fine. Sorry about reverting your edit - it looked a lot like vandalism, even if it wasn't. Thanks anyway. James^x12345 22:12, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave chem alone for a while

Hi if you dont know what you are doing with Chemistry, and you apparently do not, please dont edit in htat space. I am not trying to be nasty, but unregistered editors are allowed to contribute. OK? --Smokefoot (talk) 22:22, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, where sorry? I haven't edited any chemistry articles as of late. James^x12345 08:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John McCririck info was sourced

I actually had my sources for my attempted addition to the John McCririck article open in other tabs ready for copy/pasting of the addresses into the correct positions when I accidentally touched the wrong part of my phone's screen and submitted the content before I was ready. Can I try again? 185.26.180.44 (talk) 10:44, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you try again, be mindful of the Biographies of living persons policy. Your previous addition was borderline, so I removed it - "flagrant" and "embarrassing" are decidedly non-neutral. However, if you have something that complies with policy, go ahead and add it. Regards. James^x12345 11:09, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I agree not to use 'flagrant', but how was his behaviour not embarrassing to the broadcaster?31.110.82.240 (talk) 03:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it was, but it would have to be sourced reliably, and put in context. It would be better to say what he actually did without making any comment on it. Regards. James^x12345 12:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

James, What is reason you removed the samatha external link to a paper presented at a World Buddhist Summit ?

James, What is reason you removed the samatha external link to a paper presented at a World Buddhist Summit ? Silananda — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.24.36.128 (talk) 12:03, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It looked like a self-published or questionable source, but if you think it isn't, feel free to add it. James^x12345 12:07, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Haridwar

Not sure how you attribute to yourself the judge of 'constructive'. Having just spent some time at Haridwar I am amazed the Wikipedia page on this town is so saccharine. If publicising the disgraceful disrespect the Mansa Devi Temple shows towards the hill by spilling it's garbage down the hillside and blatantly, aggressively turning this shrine into a venal commercial operation, is considered 'not constructive', then frankly I don't know what constructive is. I was travelling with some people who were completely revolted by Hinduism by what they say at this temple, and had to try hard to explain (unsuccessfully I expect) this is not really what Hinduism is about. If your 'constructive' means avoiding the truth, then Wikipedia has become a useless site.

Michael — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.188.223.218 (talk) 13:02, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think your edits adhered to WP:NPOV. They seem intent on casting the temple in a negative light, which is not allowed. If you can find a reliable source for whatever you want to add, by all means do, but otherwise it will be removed again. Regards. James^x12345 13:26, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Logo from Euro Microfinances in Saint George article?

This is absurd. I removed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.207.187.233 (talk) 17:04, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Sorry - it was labelled as something else, and all I saw was the code. I'll retract the warnings on your talk page. Regards. James^x12345 17:06, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on John Calvin

Thanks for dealing with the vandalism. I smiled when I saw User talk:66.66.132.227, though - we can't real with that sort of vandalism under WP:BLP! St Anselm (talk) 20:39, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As somebody with a background in the Church of Scotland, I should have known better. Just as well I didn't tag it with a ^{[citation needed]} James^x12345 20:45, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

they're not test edits

if I made an error was a glitch, would fix right away. sorry. let me retry.71.127.137.171 (talk) 20:58, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think it might have been. (the edit.) I didn't understand what the stuff about the Sky Dome was, and it looked like a load of stuff had been removed. Now I see what you were doing. Good work, and thanks for taking it up with me. James^x12345 21:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, any IP editing a Fluorine page is probably one long-term editor who has decided to stop logging in for some reason. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thought they might be, given that they were requesting a peer review. It would be good for the reputation of IPs in general if Fluorine was taken to FA, something I haven't seen in a while... James^x12345 06:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV

Hi, Jamesx12345. Although I concur with your analyses I would recommend that you follow the full warning cycle before presenting your case to the vandalism intervention board. Thanks for your help and reports. Tiderolls 21:29, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I always go through the full cycle with IPs, but some accounts are simply here to cause disruption. I usually respond to anything especially egregious with a level warning 3 which lets them know how unimpressed I am, but sometimes I just report them to AIV if I know they're going to get blocked anyway. Vandalism-only accounts appear to be a grey area, but most admins are sensible enough to block without much warning to minimise disruption. Thanks again. James^x12345 21:37, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eli Manning

Why did you erase Eli Manning will move to the jets and Coughlin will be fired afterwards if the giants went 0-16? --24.170.77.177 (talk) 01:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It looked like unsourced speculation. However, if nobody else removes it I'll take that to mean it's fine - a page like that will be highly trafficked. James^x12345 06:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi, many thanks for your message. I had no idea this had happened and I haven't got a clue who it might be - about 99% of my edits are reverting vandalism & issuing warnings. Once again thanks. Denisarona (talk) 06:04, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They've been blocked anyway, but will quite possibly be back as another sock. James^x12345 06:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Super duper thank you

For all the work you have done by reverting the edits at U2 related articles. Miss Bono^{[hello, hello!]} 17:03, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the I.P. who changes dates with the edit summary Fixed? That has to one of the most maddening things to deal with, but at least my edit count has gone up by a few thousand. I liked you bit in the Signpost, by the way - when I'm not listening to Bach, I sometimes listen to U2. Thanks. James^x12345 19:48, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

K&N Engineering Page Questions

Hello James. You recently "undid" an edit I made to this page & I'm wondering why?! In the pages history, I tried to understand why the "Spicer Report" that you have added as a reference would be allowed? My understanding of "reliable sources" on Wikipedia is that they cannot be published on Forums, which is where this report has only ever been published. Royalbroil (who is apparently no longer the editor) agreed, but asked 2 other individuals to weigh in on the situation. The last it was left was that forums are not reliable sources & that the "Spicer Report" should be removed & a [citation needed] tag should be added until a reliable source could be provided. If this is changing I would appreciate some clarification of why. I'm afraid I don't understand how there could be such back & forth on this. I would have thought "No Forum posts as reliable sources" would be very clear. I look forward to hearing back from you. Thank you. 207.218.14.140 (talk) 16:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)mgooldrindge[reply]

I've left a message on the talk page and have removed the warning. Thanks you for being so polite for somebody just slapped with an underserved boilerplate message. I'm happy to do as you suggest. James^x12345 16:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Hidden Valley Downs was accepted

Hidden Valley Downs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

James^x12345 20:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Taylor article

Hi Jemesx12345,

In May you rejected the article I wrote on Thomas Happer Taylor, suggesting that while the subject had potential, the style was too promotional. I resubmitted a much revised version on or about September 24. I can't tell if you've had a chance to review it. Naturally, I hope it now qualifies for publication. But if not, I'd value editorial suggestions for improving it.

Thanks.

Murray Suid — Preceding unsigned comment added by MurraySuid (talk • contribs) 19:22, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a look, and I'm not sure. I'll leave it for somebody else this time around to see if they think he is notable enough. Sorry about the delay. James^x12345 17:50, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ikorodu

i just made a correction on the ikorodu page,ikorodu is located in lagos state and not ananmbra — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.75.86.14 (talk) 17:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any confirmation either way so I've removed it for now. A source would be great if you could find one. Many thanks. James^x12345 18:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

regarding editing in PHYSICAL FACTORS affecting libido

just edited the PHYSICAL FACTORS portion of the article LIBIDO with some true info...why you removed it buddy..?

i just edited the PHYSICAL FACTORS affecting libido portion of LIBIDO article but can't see it there... why..? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed beerman (talk • contribs) 17:38, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because Yahoo Answers doesn't meet the guidlines for sources by a long way. It might be true, but it would have to be sourced to a well-regarded book or article in a journal. Regards. James^x12345 18:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i have not only researched over social q&a websites but also explored various health websites and other relaible articles that clearly explain that during the priod of short term abstinence from sexual activity(particularly ejaculation in males) they have a higher urge to have sex.i have been really anxious these days over this issue and was really surprised that wikipedia does not mention this important physical factor that determines your libido. Providing some links that prove my point. http://www.therulesrevisited.com/2011/09/male-sex-drive-always-recharges.html http://www.pegym.com/forums/erectile-dysfunction-forum/22879-what-happens-hormones-if-you-ejaculate-more-then-once-7-days.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed beerman (talk • contribs) 19:04, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is, both of these are forums. Since anybody can say anything on a forum, they can't be considered as reliable sources. If you can find a proper article, or proper medical advice from a recognised body, that would be suitable, but the guidelines are clear. Regards. James^x12345 19:07, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12659241 a research report from National Center for Biotechnology Information. Reported that a random group of males had more than 145% of normal testosterone levels on the 7th day of sexual abstinence. now, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libido the wikipedia article stating that testosterone is chiefly responsible for libido. another article(wikipedia) that tells how prolactin,oxytocin and dopamine levels fliuctuate after ejaculation and determine the length of each refractory period. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractory_period_(sex) and finally .. a wikihow article that in the 6th point tells that men need to release their semen(once a while) which simply states they get sexually overdriven after sometime. http://www.wikihow.com/Practice-Abstinence Sir, in the a very basic question: why has wikipedia not mentioned about the gap between sexual acts and its effect of sexual desire.Please answer. I have really been anxious — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed beerman (talk • contribs) 19:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pubmed is a good source, the others less so. You might be better creating something in your sandbox and allowing another editor to check before posting it again. I can't claim to be much of an expert, but at WP:MED you should fin somebody. Regards. James^x12345 19:42, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Using primary sources for health information is usually advised against; Ed beerman should refer to Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine). Flyer22 (talk) 20:42, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PsiEpsilon#12 October 2013

You may want to comment there about the IP 123.63.97.30. Regards, M∧Ŝc²ħε И_τlk 11:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - this looks messy, to say the least. Thanks. James^x12345 11:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TB

Hello, Jamesx12345. You have new messages at Yintan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cold Mexicans

"cold Mexicans" is the nickname of that island. I have a friend that lives their. I understand why you might think I was violating the page. So if you could please change the edit back that would be much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.154.233 (talk) 22:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not sure it would be appropriate. If it was sourced reliably, it might be different, but cold mexicans sounds like something of a slur. James^x12345 08:24, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic Noonan

Hi James the spelling of a name is quite an important aspect of any article for example Jamie is a male name and Jayme is a female name. Is it better to have an incorrect article that you personally know is incorrect article a correct one? If we all thought that sort of correct was right we wouldn't be in the position of a leading country in all areas. Sorry if you think I'm being snotty but after something has been corrected that you yourself know is incorrect does it make sense to change it back the the incorrect version? Let me know what you think..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notatcreamfields (talk • contribs) 01:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find many reliable sources that suggest he is called Domenyk. The BBC one is good, but could be a mistake on their part. Regards. James^x12345 08:24, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]