User talk:Jamesx12345/Archive 7

ANEW

I closed the report you filed at WP:AN3. It was somewhat complicated requiring more than one action. I wanted to advise you, though, of a few things. Your comment about yourself and WP:3RR was incorrect; you did violate 3RR as you reverted four times. However, you had stopped reverting, and I'm assuming the fourth revert was unintentional, so I did not block you. In the future, it would be better to warn the other editor of edit warring after they've made their third revert. There was no warning in this instance (that I saw). Also, it would be good to take a minute and explain (without a template) what's wrong with their edits. I doubt it would have changed anything here, but it's always best to try. Take care.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry. I've had a chaotic time of late with being taken to noticeboards by various people with diverse aims and interests after I removed their cherished additions. Using Huggle meant I made one more revert than I counted, but I asked George8211 to take over from me. Thank you for not blocking me - that's why admins have to be human, as of 2013! I appreciate that I made some pretty basic errors with complacency and not properly warning the other editor. Thanks again. James^x1 2345 15:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Rj mitte

Rj mitte is not 5'8.. thats ridiculous. if hes 5'8, then what is aaron paul? like 5 foot 4? damn dude get a clue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.45.112.251 (talk) 03:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

When somebodies height is changed it sets off alarm bells. I've sourced it from IMDb as 6'1. Regards. James^x1 2345 09:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

BNP

My additions/editing is fair and based on neutrality as Wikipedia should be. Much of the BNP article is not relevant, not factually correct and if it is many references are from 2004 and before, which are now outdated. The integrity and neutrality of Wikipedia is being undermined by some of the content on the BNP article in my opinion.

Your right BNP bans from organizations are important. However, there is currently no legal ban on teaching. If you read the article and all articles from 2010 onwards Gove stated he will allow head teachers to remove BNP teachers if they engage in said any 'activity' in schools. Gove said being in the BNP is not compatible with teaching, but so did Labour before. It's party politicking. There is no ban on the statue book and no law preventing a BNP member from being a teacher. A report by Smith commissioned by the Government http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/8563044.stm.

Regarding 'crimes' or 'violence' the article is of the BNP as party, not about some random card carrying member who got a conviction for assault. The only relevant crimes are ones that relate to the party (as a whole) and it's leader at the time, as he represents the party in the public. The rest belongs on individual profiles and some isn't even relevant. 90% of those crimes where committed as individuals. It's not in context and outdated. About from Griffin those listed are either deceased or haven't been members for years anyway. Regards, Truenature12(talk) 21:01, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

I appreciate what you are saying. However, I think what Michael Gove said is significant, even if not enshrined in law. Perhaps some of the connections with crime could be trimmed - I have already removed some - but violent racist crimes associated with members of a political party are significant. Drink driving or tax evasion, for example, are pretty routine, but bomb-making is not. Some criticism of the BNP have been removed, but others are from major political figures and should, I think, feature. Colin Smith could perhaps be removed, and the others condensed to bullet points, but the BNP does have an unfortunate association with violence. The imprisonment of Nick Griffin is definitely important. I'd suggest that a crime by anybody with a page has the potential to be worthwhile? Thank you for not continuing a potential edit war. Regards. James^x1 2345 20:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

LEAVE ME ALONE

LEAVE ME ALONE!!! All I do is try and help Wikipedia yet you vandalize my attempts.

Whatever. James^x1 2345 20:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Why even have the fucking talk pages if we can't comment on other users?

So we can discuss constructive changes? James^x1 2345 20:47, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Fraternity stuff

Archives:why would you take out the fraternity stuff...you obviously have no clue about the neighborhood or the school history moron

I didn't - I admonished the editor that did for something else. In the future, make sure you know how stuff works before you call people morons. Regards. James^x1 2345 16:43, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Edinburgh Trams

Thanks very much again for reviewing this article. I just wanted to leave a note, as I think I've addressed your concerns. Please take a look, at your leisure. If you have any further suggestions, I'd be happy to implement them. RGloucester — 📬 16:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

I can do it now. James^x1 2345 16:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Me and two other editors have done some work to solve your remaining concerns. RGloucester — 📬 15:57, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

How's it looking? RGloucester — 📬 16:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

It's coming on well. I'm just reading through it and making a few syntax changes (cite web and cite news render differently, so I'm making sure each one is used correctly.) You've done a good job addressing the referencing - a lot of my gripes have been fixed. James^x1 2345 16:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Is there anything else you'd like me to do, or help you out with? I see you are still fixing references. RGloucester — 📬 18:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

I can't see any problems at the moment. I'm just trying to get rid of as many dead links as possible, as well as manually checking the rest and updating a few. There's a bit of overlinking going on, especially with politics - for example, Princes Street, Scottish Parliament and Lothian buses are linked quite a few times. I've checked the images and they look fine - I don't know much about the licences, but all the pictures are tagged as own work. Many thanks. James^x1 2345 18:37, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your assistance with the article. It seems to be all in order. RGloucester — 📬 17:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

It certainly seems so. I've passed it, as it satisfies the criteria, but please ensure it is kept updated as they open, fail to meet/ meet /exceed expectations, and generally as time passes for the next few years. I'll keep an eye on it as well, as an unfortunate victim of its very presence. :-) James^x1 2345 18:33, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

AE Result

Just a heads up, the AE case against you closed with a WP:BOOMERANG for the reporter. Still, do try to be a bit more careful with the repeated reverts using Huggle, when reverting for reasons other then obvious vandalism, its a good idea to investigate a bit if the first revert doesn't stick. Monty ₈₄₅ 03:29, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

I will try to be more careful in the future. However, I would maintain that calling an Irish nationalist "British" is borderline BLP violation, and also believe that blocking SonofSetanta for two weeks was a bit excessive. Sos did nothing to inflate the situation, and in a way tried to prevent further warring. Despite having reported me, I don't think it is fair that they should be punished. Just my thoughts. Regards. James^x1 2345 16:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Deaf Havana

Why did you remove what I put? She is a new member to the band. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.118.120.21 (talk) 17:30, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry. It looked like you were adding some random person, which people quite often do for bands. Thank you for reinstating it. It would be great if you could source it - see how to here - so it doesn't get removed again. Many thanks. James^x1 2345 18:03, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Signature

Hello, just pointing out that your signature is broken; the explainer text doesn't come up. I have fixed it for you.--Laun chba ller 18:10, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm probably going to take that bit out anyway. James^x1 2345 19:41, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Chest Wall Oscillation

The AffloVest is a new innovative HFCWO vest that is the first portable one in existence - approved for market by the FDA. If it does not belong in that information section, then none of them naturally should either. Perhaps you should do some research before arbitrarily removing links.

I would personally like to see all of them removed, or simply reduced to a list. Having product names in the first sentence is a recipe for advertisement. James^x1 2345 19:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Comet

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Comet you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

I might not be as readily available as usual over the next few days, but will try my best. Thanks for the review. James^x12345 19:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Comet

The article Comet you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Comet for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

NEW ISLANDS

Hi your edit to the page new edit does not make sense, as the name of the new island is not referenced and seems to be personally motivated. i propose a name that is relates to the event of the creation of this island , earth quake, without any bias personally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.248.194.95 (talk) 15:43, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I can't find any mention of an island of that name in the media - I appreciate one may have formed, but not had a name assigned yet. Your enthusiasm is admirable, but you would be better creating an article at User talk:114.248.194.95/island, for example, to move when a name is decided on. Many thanks. James^x12345 15:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Sebastiaan Bowier at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 10:34, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

i just want to make sure by deleting my user page

i dont lose my wiki account. i am trying to learn how to use this and i think i deleted a tag on a page i made by trying to delete the entire content and i think doing that tagged my user account. what do i do?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeyisahoss (talk • contribs) 21:14, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

You won't be blocked from editing unless you make blatantly promotional edits. However, your user page was nominated for deletion because all it appeared to feature was a link to your website, which is generally not allowed. If your user page is deleted, you will be able to recreate it. However, I would like to point you to Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, which may apply to you. Regards. James^x12345 21:19, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry

I think I am overlapping your edits while doing vandal reverts. I will take care of not reverting dual edits now for sometime.  A m i t   웃   17:10, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

I'm not noticing any problems - Huggle manages multiples users pretty well, I find. Am I conflicting with you at all? Regards. James^x12345 17:13, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

No issues from your side at all. But I wrongly reverted 2 of your edits which i later corrected. so thought to let you know.  A m i t   웃   17:41, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

School Bullying

Hi James, I added an additional support strategy to this article along the lines of "Ensure your school uses an anti-bullying system such as Bully-watch or Hipster" which I think you removed thinking it was an advert (adv?)

I feel it is very important for schools to realise that this new technology exists that allows children to report bullying and cyber bullying from their home computer directly to the school.

I didn't want to appear as though I was promoting any one product hence I found these two which seem to be the market leaders for the UK and US. For the same reason I deliberately did not include URLs to their websites - I did not wish to advertise!

As so many children use Wikipedia to assist with their homework I thought it was an excellent place to raise awareness of these non-profit technologies that further harness the power of the internet to potentially save lives.

If you think that these technologies are worthy of their own section ("Modern technology to fight bullying"?) then I would be only too happy to sign up as a contributor and write such a piece.

Please excuse my "newbie" errors - long time reader of Wikipedia but I've never attempted to contribute before. Thanks. 82.20.26.74 (talk) 20:56, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for that exceptionally well-considered response - civility is very important here, and you certainly seem to excel in that regard. Having looked again, at the article, it is of poor quality, so whatever you can do to tidy it up, please do. I don't think there is enough content for modern technology to merit its own article, but I could be wrong. When reinserting the content, however, you could take of the "Ensure your school" to bring it in line with the other items in the list. It just makes it look less as if you are selling something :-). Thank you, anyway, and do set up an account. Regards. James^x12345 21:04, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

86.151.229.75

I've put something on AIV about this user. He seems to have made a flood of possibly incorrect release dates - but I did do a random check and one came out legit, so I'm unsure of the extent right now. Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me bro!} 14:10, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. There's currently a discussion ongoing on Mark Arsten's talk page as to what is going on here. I'm pretty sure they've seen the messages, as they reverted the template warning I added, so why they aren't responding , IDK. Regards. James^x12345 14:17, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Fiji

In fiji the country people drive on the right hand side of the car and not the left as mentioned confer to your article as this is relevant detail that i have mentioned.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.235.79.11 (talk) 13:37, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

A number of sources, such as this video, this site, and The Land Transport Authority say you drive on the left. Where are you getting the fact they drive on the right from? Regards. James^x12345 13:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Project Runway All-Stars 3

Hello, Here are two reasons why I reverted the edit: 1.) The content was completely unsourced 2.) The season hasn't even started yet, no one but producers or contestants will know the outcome. Matze-bepy123 (talk) 16:29, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Project Runway: All Stars (season 3)

Yup, you appear to be right. Feel free to go ahead and remove all of it. It would be interesting to see if the table is correct, though... James^x12345 16:37, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, yeah, to be honest, I am quite excited too, but I don't want Daniel to win this season. Matze-bepy123 (talk) 16:59, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Wahhabi movement

Hello,

Thanks for the message about leaving coment on your page...there are many inaccurate statements about Islam on wikipedia related to this sufi Naqshbandi supreme council of America... these ARE the people of the such societies as the illuminati, even worse, because I know them personally on many levels...it is ironic that when I corrected information about them having a chain back to Abu Bakr (first caliph) on the page about Abu Bakr it was immediately edited probably less than 5 sec later (likely by you know what types - he had his page vandalized 9 times which only shows that he is a real time information controller - not to mention his edit was deleted from the edit history which should theoretically be available to all!)...

I hope you are not these types and if you are it would be no surprise anyways...at least yours was not immediately edited literally in real time...these types of pages regarding the so styled, self proclaimed /tariqah sufis are watched...in addition to almost every islamic page is skewed towards advocating some groups over the other...not to mention many of them use the same redundant sources which promote their own agenda...they are also sometimes organized inaccurately! On the page about Mahdi, I had edited a long while back and put Sunni sahih hadith sources under the 'sunni section', because someone had put all the sunni sahih hadith sources under the shia section! All I did was put the right sources and relevant quotes under the right section and added more quotes...It was absurd that it was changed back...it is like quoting a book irrelevant to a sect to support its view...even when there is no debate about some well established fact somehow these pages get changed....

back to the issue about this 'Supreme' Council' and one of their main 'sheikhs' who wears his blue turban every now and then, use jinns and black magic (as absurd as that sounds to you I know from personal experience), has several mansions here and there...met with Dick Cheney...etc... etc...

...Rumi (considered a real SUFI) himself mentioned this himself:

The philosopher denies the existence of the Devil;

At the same time he is the Devil's laughing-stock.
If thou hast not seen the Devil, look at thyself,
Without demon's aid how came that blue turban 2 on thy brow?
Whosoever has a doubt or disquietude in his heart
Is a secret denier and philosopher.
Now and then he displays firm belief,
But that slight dash of philosophy blackens his face.
Beware, O believers! That lurks in you too;
You may develop innumerable states of mind.
All the seventy and two heresies lurk in you;
Have a care lest one day they prevail over you!

2. - Blue turbans were considered a sign of hypocrisy (Hafiz, Ode 5).

I have the Mathnavi and I believe there is mention of the preparation of the Masih-ad-dajjal (anti-christ, false messiah who will proclaim he is God himself) if sufis are considered awliya Allah (friends of God), fact is most people will never meet a 'real' sufi... if the average person did meet 'real sufis' they probably wouldnt realize it...and if they did know it, it is because of some reason like they themselves are loved by God because of their belief and deeds...not to mention it is not even necessary for God to love you...

I think however all mention of this 'supreme' illuminati styled council of self proclaimed sufis who take an oath of allegiance from followers and ask one to pass your good deeds to them should be under a CULT section..all these tariqah orders are just like the catholic orders or any other religious order which are based on false power structures which have little to do with the reality of their religion...you may call this an opinion which is fine...but I dont appreciate that all the islamic pages on wikipedia and elsewhere on the web have been overun by the 'supreme council' as the primary source on islamic information...right the people who met with Dick Cheney and his like are the experts linked to the companions?...do you think Abu Bakr or Umar would do that?

These people are awliya shaitaan (meaning friends of Satan) not awliya allah (friends of God) - I would know, don't really want to say why - in fact every single one of these self procalimed sufis today with large followings, that take oaths, that give flowery speeches, pretend like they are this and that are not who they are...and are using media to spread their jinn, kundalini raising, chakra system, stuff to attract the weak and suggest them to do bad and leave the good in themselves.

If you have edited it and already know who they are, I hope you will have a change of heart. Thanks and take care kid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.0.214.17 (talk) 22:28, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I'm not exactly sure what you are saying - I know very little about Islam. However, I am skeptical of any link with the Illuminati. You might find a better person to talk to at WikiProject Islam. Regards. James^x12345 15:43, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Stewart Downing

Stewart Downing is shit. Ask any football fan in England who's sober.

Unfortunately, a veritable plethora of policy means we can't say that. Good day. James^x12345 16:13, 1 October 2013 (UTC)