User talk:Jamesluxley

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Frederick's Church, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 17:23, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userspace move of Oikema

Hi Jamesluxley - this is just to let you know that I have moved your article, Oikema into your userspace at User:Jamesluxley/Oikema - the reason for this is it is presently very short of references, and does not appear to be useable as an encyclopedia article. Normally for definitions of words and suchlike, we would refer you to our dictionary project, Wiktionary, which is where this article might be better suited to. Thank you for your understanding, Fish ^Barking? 21:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chrysis

The article Chrysis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

rambling article with no focus. Only source is to a translation of a privately printed book which is extensively quoted from. No indication of WP:notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 12:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamesluxley/Oikema

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 03:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jamesluxley, and thanks for writing the Oikema article! I'm just going to fix the page move that got nominated for deletion above, by doing a history merge. Please bear with me while I do this - it will involve deleting and then undeleting the article that you've been working on. You won't lose any work though, so don't worry. When everything is finished the page history will all be in one place, rather than split across two pages as it is now. It shouldn't take more than 10 minutes to fix, so please hold off from editing the article until I'm done, to avoid any edit conflicts. Thanks — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 08:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, all finished now. Edit away. :) — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 08:41, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oikema for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oikema is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oikema until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oikema

I notice your use of first person in Oikema. This is usually not recommend per tone Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chrysis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chrysis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrysis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 09:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Your recent editing history at Oikema shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI report

You are mentioned here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly trying to use Wikipedia to promote your own theories and agenda. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You got Sabaidee wrong. Wiki Nation are about to fly. Well, since you like to joke we need to keep the humor going. Anyway, deleted, blocked. So much for truth and free speech :-) Should we leak it? No, it will just end up United so just keep a copy. I did try and they failed because the truth hurts but we can still get the news out and people can think for themselves. Oikema is a whore house if you like it or not. We find the word Oikema used in architecture describing a brothel. If we take each letter O i k e m a and translate this we get: Ο Ι Κ ε μ ένα which includes ένα. ένα actually translates to "a" which is Greek Alpha which is ὥρᾱ hōrā [hɔ̌ːraː] "a time". In Swedish a whore is hora which is bitch, prostitute, slut etc.

This is linguistics and that is a science. Oikema can through simple translations be directly translates to whorehouse. The Latin and Greek language works like this and in history many words have been constructed as to hide the true meaning of words. Even Swedish and Danish and Dutch has been used. In fact all languages. An example is that Latin: testis translates to ένα.

But you neither want Oikema nor empirical proof so what is WikiLepia all about anyway I ask. Oikema is used in Architecture but that fact you don't like either. You don't even care to begin reading as in Lazy Romans. You can try and do a few translations and then read the sections about how the Bible is constructed and then you might open for the gates of real knowledge so Wikipedia can expand and become a real (good) tool of enlightenment. Until then I shall gladly use Wikipedia to unlock some more lies and words of pure utter deceit - but not here it seems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesluxley (talk • contribs) 14:39, 20 August 2012‎

It doesn't matter how much of your own personal reasoning you offer, Wikipedia can not be used as an outlet for your own research/ideas - please see WP:OR. There are other venues out there where it is appropriate to publish your original thoughts, but this encyclopedia is not one of them. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote about Chrysis and was told it was soon to be deleted and was told: Only source is to a translation of a privately printed book which is extensively quoted from. Little did the fool know that this book is by Pierre_Louÿs which you can fond at Wikipedia. You write an entry on Wikipedia which is suppose to expand and you have to write online. One can prepared the whole thing and then paste in in I suppose but the idea is I suppose also that you actually write and then expand over time. So I wanted to write about the character Chrysis as people write about James Bond but DELETE DELETE DELETE. THis is how perhaps young ignorant people work but I do not. I know what I am doing and I know that does not ring bells in these heads because real intelligence does not come on a silver plate. I have copied every file and I can work by myself and will prove my point both with regards to Oikema and Chrysis and Poineon all deleted, moved or shuffed around. And then on top of that these people are rude and right out trolling or whatever you understand being an imbasil to be. Up to you. If you really don't want new entries and articles then just say so. So idiot tells me Chysis is unrelated and of no value and weants it deletes. I know these types. I call them Knights of DEL. I fear ignorance like I hate Ishtar but that does not mean I can't write about both Ishtar and ignorant people and all that followed. So I have the sources, the linguistic empirical proof and DEL DEL DEL the Knights of DEL jumps in like they knew nothing better and they surely cum good and even and with that they feel the power. Let them for all I care. It only shows one thing and that is the house of cards are going where they belong and a new deck can be rolled out containing not only 13 cards but 1 and it is not an ace. Waiting for a reply to see if even foolish fools can learn. If not then so be it. Domani rhymes with Romani and you can take that or not. Up to you and your buddy friends who you wish to mingle with which proves one more thing; apples do not fall far from the trunk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesluxley (talk • contribs) 18:04, 20 August 2012‎

File copyright problem with File:Chrysis being Astarte showing her body to Demetrios.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Chrysis being Astarte showing her body to Demetrios.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]