Jump to content

User talk:JamesLuiz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Jamesluiz102)
Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Jamesluiz102! I noticed your contributions to Adobe Audition and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! NonsensicalSystem(error?)(.log) 12:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Jamesluiz102 (talk) 12:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

[edit]

Hi Jamesluiz102. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talkwork) 13:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i made a mistake

[edit]

when i rollbacked your edit i meant to rollback the vandal's blatant vandalism and I apologize for the confusion. Tdhello 17:39, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, look carefully next time to revert. -Jamesluiz102- (talk) (contribs) 17:42, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Danneel Ackles: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Hockeycatcat (talk) 09:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hockeycatcat Did I make the mistake? -Jamesluiz102- (talk) (contribs) 09:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jamesluiz102, yes, unfortunately, you didn't warn IP user 2409:4072:6314:CCE5:E288:868B:44B1:23BA. Cheers, Hockeycatcat (talk) 09:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hockeycatcat Okay, I now read the Wikipedia rules WP:UWUL and WP:WARN carefully. -Jamesluiz102- (talk) (contribs) 09:35, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Resolved

Hockeycatcat (talk) 10:13, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
7 times in a row have you beaten me to reverting vandalism! Amazing work. ~~ 🌀𝚂𝙲𝚂 𝙲𝙾𝚁𝙾𝙽𝙰🌀 17:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Super Cyclonic Storm Corona Many, many thanks! I appreciate for that. -Jamesluiz102- (talk) (contribs) 17:45, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on "Roller Rink" page

[edit]

Using the IP address with this computer at the time a page labeled roller rink was edited for seemingly no reason. The point of this edit done by Mr. John Dunne was to prove that Wikipedia although full of knowledge was unreliable due to the ability by anyone to edit he has since understood that he was wrong and that edits are closely monitored for reason.ExcelsiorGaming (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Old Jail, Washington, GA

[edit]

First, and as a disclaimer, I'm new at this and never understand these systems very well.

Thanks for your email saying that some recent content might have been rejected or deleted. How do I know what it was so that I can fix it?

My wife and I own the building and are interested in getting our Wikipedia entry correct and useful.

OldBuildingsDoug (talk) 14:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@OldBuildingsDoug You can ask this question at the Teahouse. -Jamesluiz102- (talk) (contribs) 15:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

I know that the opinion is not yours, but the opinion on the characterization of the character is offensive and I would appreciate if you delete the review so that no one is offended by said opinion, which seems to me without arguments and totally out of place. That is why I deleted it, since you have addressed me with your good character, I would appreciate it if you would remove the review, although I know that it is not yours. All the best — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.148.239.57 (talk) 15:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Jamesluiz102! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:12, Saturday, June 26, 2021 (UTC)

Sleep disorder

[edit]

Hello Jamesluiz102. I noticed that on this edit (made by a user that you warned) on the article Sleep disorder, the user has provided the sources on its claims. I am wondering that... I think they (sources) might be reliable or not. What can you say about that?----Rdp060707|talk 07:04, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent revert to the said article has been reverted. I think you should be careful in reverting by reading the edit carefully.----Rdp060707|talk 07:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the third edit by an user (that you have gave a warning to it) has been reverted. Don't worry about that, it has been restored to your revision, I think.----Rdp060707|talk 05:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it was ElKevbo, who stated that it was neither helpful nor appropriate. Jamesluiz102 (talk) 05:36, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Keep Up... CocoGT (talk) 03:35, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks... Jamesluiz102 (talk) 03:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help can you review the article I created for Joaquin Domagoso.

[edit]

Good day, I would have asked for help because someone proposed a deletion in the article I created, he said no because he is the mayor's son, this is not a basis to say that he is an actor and he doesn't have any significant roles on television. I also have a list of shows and series that he voted for me not to be deleted and someone also helped, I hope you can help me thank you. --7starunited (talk) 13:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]