User talk:Jameshogue

Orphaned non-free image File:Parkgate Press logo (copyright Parkgate Press).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Parkgate Press logo (copyright Parkgate Press).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:06, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Parkgate Press logo (copyright Parkgate Press; Wikipedia Fair Use).png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parkgate Press logo (copyright Parkgate Press; Wikipedia Fair Use).png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:57, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Parkgate Press logo (copyright Parkgate Press; Wikipedia Fair Use).png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parkgate Press logo (copyright Parkgate Press; Wikipedia Fair Use).png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MacMed^talk _stalk 20:21, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Knight of New Orleans for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Knight of New Orleans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Knight of New Orleans until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:20, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 99.12.242.170 (talk) 01:25, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. 99.12.242.170 (talk) 01:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think this may be relevant as well: not only is WP:COI a likely concern here, but there's reason to think you're using multiple accounts [1], [2] to edit the same articles, in an attempt to game the system, which is also counter to Wikipedia guidelines. it doesn't smell right when multiple accounts edit in unison, remove maintenance templates without explanation or resolving the issues, and refuse to discuss their edits. 99.12.242.170 (talk) 01:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing Wikipedia. 99.12.242.170 (talk) 01:43, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Really, I'm going to ask that all of your accounts be blocked if necessary, and the pages be locked. 99.12.242.170 (talk) 01:43, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 99.12.242.170 (talk) 01:44, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 99.12.242.170 (talk) 01:57, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]