User talk:Jamesfuhrman
Please remove your email address from this article if you wish to keep it on Wikipedia. Signing your own name at the bottom of articles implies that you have asserted copyright over the preceding text which subsequently conflicts with Wikipedia's own licensing. -- Netsnipe (Talk) 18:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but it's official Wikipedia policy not to leave your own name in any article you have written. Please see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. If you want people to still be able to contact you, I suggest you leave your contact details on your Wikipedia:User page and anyone clicking the history link will know that you were the initial author. Thanks, -- Netsnipe (Talk) 07:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as those in John Heilman, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! -- Netsnipe (Talk) 18:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary and your personal analysis of an article into Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Avogel 15:32, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Note: you apparently have been going after various WeHo councilmembers. Is this really the place?Avogel 15:32, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Lady Colin Campbell, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.chatshow.net/Interviews/interview.aspx?interviewID=120. As a copyright violation, Lady Colin Campbell appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lady Colin Campbell has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Lady Colin Campbell. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Lady Colin Campbell, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Netsnipe (Talk) 17:02, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:3 1160696950IMG 0307.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:3 1160696950IMG 0307.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Edits to Jerome Cleary
[edit]Hello. I had some concerns about your edits to the Jerome Cleary article. While the desire to make an entry about a comedian funny is understandable, it is important to keep it an encyclopedia article. Some play with humor is acceptable, but obviously unencyclopedic content like "His sister lives somewhere in the East, and has recently doubled up on her shifts" is not. Please modify the article to better fit the style of wikipedia content. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me.
Also, the all-caps headings are nonstandard and should be changed.
Other than these details, thank you for your time and your contributions!
DarwinPeacock 10:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Your edit to Jerome Cleary
[edit]Your recent edit to Jerome Cleary (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Request for article deletion
[edit]Hello. I would gladly help with your request for article deletion -- however, I am not an Administrator. You probably should go through the Wikipedia:Proposed deletion process. If you want to contact a helpful admin directly, try Kukini. DarwinPeacock 22:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Philippe Cousteau Jr., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. --Muchness 10:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to be so quick on the reversion trigger, but do you have a source for the quotes per WP:BLP? RJASE1 Talk 01:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
An article that you created, Philippe Cousteau Jr., has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippe Cousteau Jr. Thank you. SkierRMH 05:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Thomas Riccio
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Thomas Riccio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 09:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Alfred Beardsley
[edit]A tag has been placed on Alfred Beardsley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 09:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Yale galanter
[edit]A tag has been placed on Yale galanter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 09:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Yale galanter
[edit]A tag has been placed on Yale galanter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 09:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Copyright problems with Image:Ripwemmy fs.jpg
[edit]An image that you uploaded, Image:Ripwemmy fs.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BlueAzure (talk) 23:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:KightMorris.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:KightMorris.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Lear's Magazine
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lear's Magazine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- not notable
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ysangkok (talk) 14:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Colin Martin
[edit]
I have nominated Colin Martin, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Martin. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Paul_012 (talk) 19:48, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)