User talk:Jamescool101

Welcome!

Hello, Jamescool101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 05:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bacillus subtilis has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bacillus subtilis was changed by Jamescool101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.898809 on 2016-06-27T08:27:57+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:28, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tendinopathy, D-Chiro-Inositol

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Before you go back and add those sources, read WP:MEDRS.

January 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Tendinopathy, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to D-chiro-Inositol, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:56, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tendinopathy, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 05:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please normal use sentence capitalization?

Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 06:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tendinopathy. Jim1138 (talk) 06:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please see WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS under wp:Tendentious editing Jim1138 (talk) 06:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 06:41, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamescool101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PUBMED ARTICLE INFORMATION ARE PEER REVIEWD BY MANY SCIENTIST IN RELEVANT FIELDS. SO ADDING INFORMATION FROM THAT SOURCES IS VALID. SO ALL PEOPLE WILL GET LATEST INFORMATION ABOUT THAT. BY REMOVING THAT INFORMATION WITHOUT ANY CHECKING RESEARCH ARTICLE CONTENT SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED

Decline reason:

Your unblock request only argues your belief that the edits you made were constructive. Looking at your contributions, it is clear that they were not. Your unblock request does not address the disruption, nor does it even attempt to acknowledge your understanding of Wikipedia's policies and how you'll edit constructively. Please take some actual time, read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks, and start by reading Wikipedia:Five pillars before you consider another appeal. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamescool101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accept my wrong beliefs and respect and will follow wikipedia norms from now on and will provide extensive well researched information published in highly reputed journals from MEDICINES. So kindly doing request to unblock. Jamescool101 (talk) 11:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This still doesn't address your deliberate vandalism. Yamla (talk) 11:48, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamescool101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accept my wrong beliefs and respect and will follow wikipedia norms from now on and will provide extensive well researched information published in highly reputed journals from MEDICINES. So kindly doing request to unblock to Mr. Widr, Mr. Oshwah, Mr. Yamla. kindly do needful. Jamescool101 (talk) 11:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This still doesn't address your deliberate vandalism. Yamla (talk) 11:48, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.