User talk:Jamesbonci2018

July 2015

Hello, I'm Gareth Griffith-Jones. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Nick Jordan (character) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 18:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bianca Jackson. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bianca Jackson was changed by Jamesbonci2018 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90057 on 2015-07-27T13:55:43+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alfie Moon, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Alfie Moon was changed by Jamesbonci2018 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939466 on 2015-07-27T14:10:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrbaylis2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. –anemone projectors– 15:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charlie Fairhead.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Charlie Fairhead was changed by Jamesbonci2018 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897492 on 2015-07-27T17:14:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Ella Anderson. Fake bio info Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]