User talk:James Robinson

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user and for vandalism. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All your edits have been reverted.
To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|reason}} on this page, replacing reason with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.
Netsnipe ► 13:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

James Robinson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't even know what a sock puppet is, and all my edits have been genuin including the two pages i created

Decline reason:

Sockpuppet of Che Guvara confirmed by Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Hunter91 -- Netsnipe ► 15:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

could somebody pz tell me what the hell is going on and why have i been blocked, as far as i know i have not affended anybody. Also whats a sockpuppet and who is Mechanismtongs? --James Robinson 15:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The review of your block is currently pending the results of the following Wikipedia:Checkuser request for Hunter91 which may take 24-48 hours to complete. -- Netsnipe ► 16:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't told me what a sockpuppet is and who on earth is Mechanismtongs? But whatevers going on i guess i can wait 24 houres...--James Robinson 16:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey -- look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry. Basically, this is an accusation that your account is an account run by the same person as the owner of another account, and that the multiple accounts are being used to either (1) make certain activities appear to have broader support than they really do, or (2) to circumvent a block. User:Mechanismtongs is the account this one is thought to be related to. If this is all incorrect, checkuser will amost certainly detect it, so just hang tight. Mango juice^talk 17:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --James Robinson 17:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I find it very hard that you don't know what a sockpuppet is considering you accused Hut 8.5 of being one.[1] -- Netsnipe ► 17:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I diddent know at the time, he was accused of being one by another editor and i assumed this was related to his deleating some of my edits (although we have resolved this issus) --James Robinson 19:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

James Robinson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27504 was submitted on Nov 07, 2019 15:45:19. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:45, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]