User talk:James A. Donald

Nazism

If you think that there is something wrong with Nazism feel free to edit out the content to which you object, as long as that content is not sourced. -- Vision Thing -- 14:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nazism

Please do not remove sourced material without discussing it first. --Neon white 13:57, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Nazism

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Neon white 02:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR on 2009 Honduran coup d'état

You have violated WP:3RR on the 2009 Honduran coup d'état article. 3RR, which if in case you didn't already know, means that you cannot revert three or more times during a 24 hour span. A violation of 3RR constitutes as WP:Edit warring which can result in a temporary WP:Block.

Multiple users have removed your unsourced block quote and you have continued to re-add it. Block quotes don't belong in in the WP:Lead section. The Honduran constitution is discussed further on in the article, so there is no need to put a block quote about it as just the second paragraph of a long article. And your interpretation of the Honduran constitution is different from others. --Tocino 22:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks, mangling comments by others

With this edit you accused others of lying, in contravention of Wikipedia:No personal attacks, and breached WP:TALK guidelines by deleting someone else's signature and adding your own unsigned comments in the middle of other people's comments, completely confusing the thread. I've therefore undone your edit, please present the issues you want to raise in a properly threaded way, signing each comment so that the thread is clear, and don't accuse others of lying. . dave souza, talk 11:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I ran across you name looking for the last sane person to have edited "Liberation Theology", and wanted to share this source with someone who could appreciate it and its implications : [1] . It appears that the same types that have often plagued me and my areas of editing are doing the same things where you edit. Good luck.--Die4Dixie (talk) 22:21, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TCP delayed acknowledgment

The article TCP delayed acknowledgment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOT#MANUAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 02:13, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking as "some asshole", maybe you should consider not creating deletable pages and making personal attacks. Ironholds (talk) 02:14, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight) and Emma Sulkowicz

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This is in relation to the edit which introduced unsourced material concerning a Emma Sulkowicz to the article Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight). Any further edits introducing similar unsourced material will result, as detailed above, in the application of discretionary sanctions. Nick (talk) 09:59, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]