User talk:James5555

Welcome!

Hello, James5555, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Ghirla ^-трёп- 13:05, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:876944948.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:876944948.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 11:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander II of Russia

Hey, I think maybe there's been some misunderstanding. I don't think the box is a bad idea at all, I just think it needs to be cleaned up a bit. I also think it would be great if it was created as a template so its like all the other Royal Line boxes in the other articles like you pointed out. I noticed that you haven't been around Wikipedia long (under think account name at least), so if there's anything I can do to help with the format or explaining how to make it a template, just drop me a line. Thanks! .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 08:09, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to add that I made a slightlymore detailed comment along the same same lines at Talk:Alexander II of Russia. I'm willing to help with fixing the code and all too, If you want me to. Circeus 02:05, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Please never ever move articles without discussion first. Such moves are very ill-advised no matter how certain you are about how good are they, except very few non-controversial cases. Your move of the Russian empress article may spark fire. In any case, please do not ever do it. --Irpen 23:57, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please take Irpen's warning very seriously. That is unacceptable before the consensus is reached. I could block you for disruption in not Irpen arguing that the moves were in good faith and the consensus is almost reached. Please be careful next time, there is no harm in waiting a few more hours for the move but a lot of disruption if the consensus goes the other way and you have to move everything back. Alex Bakharev 03:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

James, I have reverted your move of Mary I of Scotland. This is a controversial page and you did not follow the correct procedure of requesting the move and waiting for consensus. Please don't do anything like this again. Deb 10:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Estrogen

Hi James. Unfortunately, I had to move the page back from Oestrogen for a number of reasons; 1) Estrogen is the more common spelling, esp. in medical literature (Oestrogen is the British spelling, it's also my native spelling of it), 2) there were already redirect pages from Oestrogen already, 3) ummm - you forgot to also move the talk page, 4) it broke a gazillion links which directly point to Estrogen (see here and 5) you should never unilaterally move a page like that without discussing it on the article's talk page first. It can cause a lot of mess, which can require an administrator to fix (this one did). I notice others have warned you about this before. Anyways - if you've any questions, just leave a note on my talk page - Alison ☺ 08:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

premature death

be more vigilant?. Please, sir, you be more vigilant. -- Thisis0 15:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NZ election

Hi, I've noticed you've updated a couple of pages to reflect the result of the New Zealand election. You might be interested in joining the Election 2008 taskforce, which aims to co-ordinate all the updates in order to get everything done and in a timely manner. --Helenalex (talk) 06:49, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Romanov coat of arms.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Romanov coat of arms.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:39, 6 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:39, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Russian crown.jpg

The file File:Russian crown.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]